Your Most Important Human Right In Our Struggle

Article 19 of the UN Human Rights Charter explicitly states:
"Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without
interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers."

Click Here For Countries in Flagrant Violation of Article 19

This is the example of double standards we witness day in day out. Homosexuals fight for their right to speak their voice but when that victory is reached the next step is to silence those who oppose them.

When Blacks won a voice they spoke out for years, even having nations refer to Nelson Mandela as a freedom fighter rather than as a Terrorist. But when the White race challenges the Attack against their people they are classed as haters and propagandists. 

Our call for land of our own, un damaged culture, preservation all fall upon death ears and we are simply labelled as Nazis or Racists!

Read the top line again and answer honestly, can free speech really be free if I cannot challenge ahistorical event? Can freedom really come when countless people are jailed simply for expressing an oppinion which according to our human rights is well within our rights?

Does every man jailed for political speech therefore not deserve compensation for wrongful Imprisonment?

Does the United Nations not have to step in and declare the conviction of Historians for discussing or questioning the Holocaust unlawful?

Or do they simply display who controls them by having a bending of the rules!


I cannot think of any other historical event that is punishable by prison terms? If I suggested absolute ludicrous suggestions like not a single man died in the battle of the Somme, or that no one died from starvation under Stalin, or that not a single person died in the bombing of Dresden, or that not a single innocent civilian died from accidental bombing in Vietnam no one would take me to a court and threaten me with jail.

They would simply present masses of facts that would make me look like a liar and a fool.

The problem is that with the question surrounding the Holocaust too many questions have been raised and rather than being intulectual and countering the claims against the official story, they clam up and make it illegal to discuss new facts brought to light.

If we lived our lives based around this way of thinking we wouldn't have ever discovered the world as we know it because man would still be too scared to fall off of what was once known as a flat globe.
We would have settled with half hearted facts and we wouldn't know about gravity as we do today, we wouldn't have advanced in the slightest in fact it is fair to say that without challenging an original theory we would still be rubbing two sticks together and most likely wouldn't have even gone as far as to consider using straw or thinner wood material as kindling.

One example is this...

Polish government has reduced official number of Jews killed at Auschwitz from 4

to 1.5 million

 

 This is one example of figures being wrong.... by 2.5 million people. Imagine the UK Government forgot to give 2.5 million people basic health care? You would soon see 2.5 million angry people protesting their rights. Or if 2.5 million unemployed didn't get their benefit money paid in on time? You would hear about this almost instantly.

The changes to the memorial stones took years and there is one majorly important question to be asked also...

They dropped the number from 4 million to 1.5 million "murdered" at Auschwitz and yet the 6 million total remains the same. If you ask why in some nations then you go to jail.

We can't have freedom of expression for some but NOT for others! It has to be free speech for all, it has to be your human right to express any opinion you choose and this should mean simply with regards to things like websites, forums, blogs that if you don't like what you read then don't read it.

There are billions of websites online with billions of views on a vast range of issues. If you remove free speech as a human right then you basically are saying that no person has the right to ANY oppinion EVER! and its this basic understanding of supressing oppinion that the enemies of our movement don't understand or appreciate. The leftists will fight for equality and fair rights for all but then say that white preservation is hatred. Mainly run Zionist media will say that we need to embrace multiculturalism while in Israel they are putting out strict clear messages to Jewish girls not to breed with Arabs and Non Jews, saying that if "we do not have an identity or culture then we really don't exist" nobody challenges this oppinion and I personally don't challenge this oppinion I stand by the policy because if I didn't that would make me a hypocrite witch I most certainly am not.

 The freedom to voice your concerns is a right we all have but anyone with half open eyes can see that this equality isn't equal this diversity is diverse only to certain ethnic groups not including the white peoples of the world. The right to question history is a right any man or woman has. To close the lid on historical events is as negative as it would be to stop science dead in its tracks tomorrow and settle with all we know. We would put millions of lives at risk with no future research on medecine, we would risk the lives of millions of new born babies who could have been saved had we just kept on looking at how we can learn more. In many ways making it illegal to deny or argue an event is de-evolution of the human mind. 

Imagine we had it the way of the enemy and we closed the door on history. No finally working out the wonders and mystery surrounding how Stonehendge come to be, no further understanding of what made the greeks such an attribute to makind, no further understanding of great lost civilizations of our past, no explanation for the things we are yet to understand. Just like a fear of falling from the earth because it is flat. It takes just one person to suggest another way, another choice, another alternative to the choice we have already made or accepted. 

If we want free speech, if people the world over want the basic human right to speak out and express themselves then its up to the world to defend free speech and expression. Its up to us as a race to say that we are humans and we have a basic human right that the United Nations declared.

I am talking here to just those reading my blog, so I break no laws and insult no one because you all have come here of your own accord. Just as anyone coming to this blog would know that the National Front has views based on Race and Nation so if your coming into the debate you can't then claim to be offended and thats what the law is trying to do to us. 

If 100 people attend a meeting and 99 agree on full content of a speech, the crazy PC laws want to make it that the 1 man can claim to be offended and you face a race hate or political thought crime charge of some kind. Thats why it is important for people to understand the way they trap people with incitement and a reason I will never allow myself to fall under the "Incitement" charge. Incitement is me saying you should ... or i think you should all... or I call on you all to ....

 A lot of less informed youngsters fall into this all the time and in all reality most times charges of incitement are brought against someone it is clear that the word incitement should actually be considered (in most cases) as motivation. If I say we have a rally in 3 weeks and I say I urge as many people as possible to attend is this incitement? or is this the same act that the Conservative or Labour party would use to gather support for a key speech?

We either have free speech or we don't but its time all these anti NF groups realize that you can't win free speech and then try and take it from others, unless of course like the monster Zionist puppet UAF have shown thats the exact ideology that you gain from the tutors of your philosophy..

I won't insult the UAF because they would quickly jump on it as Hate Speech but I end with a prime example of a White political activist who was killed in the USA this week. Dave Lynch now the people who fight "WHITE HATERS" posted this on anti racist websites all over the world and some quotes from this haters of hate were as follows.

"I hope his family suffer for ever and his kids grow up lonely Rot In Piss"

"Good Riddance To Scum"

"Lets hope his kids go in care Rot In Piss"

Just three random quotes among many that you can find online. You don't have to like the man but if you never met him and never had any dealings with him, plus you are an activist for anti racism then surely this isn't how you talk about a man or about a family who now has lost its father?

As sick as these comments are I have to painfully accept their right to free speech, but if I suggested that 1 less Jew dies in World War 2 I would be a Nazi, if I suggested that a large majority of Black Youth stabbed in London are related to gang activity and drug distribution I would be hateful? 

Thanks for reading....