Monday, February 28, 2011

Official Statement From Young National Front 28.02.11

In 2001 when the National Front become an everyday part of my life I quickly found many good people living around me (London) and we always turned out in our group to support St Georges Day and other events. Not massive numbers but enough people to think to yourself "We have decent ...patriots locally to stand as one"

Around 2006 that support had died away, a lot of those good lads had Joined the BNP because it was going somewhere politically and a lot of those lads had been right to realize that they had to somehow change the political platform in order to change anything else.

Around 2007 I took it upon my self to try and get a Demo put together in Hyde Park to remember ALL VICTIMS OF WHITE RACIST MURDER I still had support within the NF but I found many more people in and around other sites and forums across the net. Blood and Honour is a place I call home. Most of my best friends around Europe are supporters of Blood and Honour and almost all European "Right Wing Parties" show open support for them.

The Racial Volunteer Force who each year make the effort to support Remembrance also are quickly dismissed by political factions when in all reality these factions are the only allies we truly have. The ideology of "Nationalism" has become twisted to say the least but the NF, Blood & Honour and RVF have not slipped into the lies, they didn't abandon ship because someone threw a match on board. They simply stamped out the match.

The BNP distance themselves from Blood & Honour because they are now playing the game how the enemy want them to play it. The dice are rigged but as long as Griffin is the one at the head of the table getting the attention he will pretend he is in control of "lady luck" when he throws them.

In European parties, especially in the areas like Hungary, Romania they manage to include all factions. In Serbia they have many people who will stand together on issues they agree on even if they don't agree on everything because they fight for common goals and to make right all wrongs. One by one, little by little if need be but they all work in sync with each other and get better results because of it. This is the main reason why the EDL ideology cannot take off in those areas because they have seen the "Solution" come only to later become NATO bombings on their kinsman. The Pro Zionist doctrine isn't welcome in lands who took 60 + years after the war to truly free themselves from the monster that was Marxist Communism.

I spent 6 months drawing attention to an event to be held at speakers corner. No factions, no political agenda, no trying to sign people up to various parties and movements. Just all those who thought KILLING WHITE PEOPLE FOR BEING WHITE IN WHITE LANDS WAS WRONG!

That first year maybe 200 people gathered, some from as close as Victoria, others from Newcastle, Birmingham, Norfolk, Yarmouth, Manchester, Ulster, Glasgow, Edinburgh and then others who made the effort from Poland, Frankfurt Germany, Milan Italy, and various other places from John O Groats to lands End. And maybe 500-1000 people passed by, took photos, asked questions, looked at the countless placards with fallen faces and wondered why this was the first time they had known of such acts against the natives of this land.

We held that event in 2007, 2008 and 2009 and then when 2010 came around we started to witness people gathering behind a banner calling for "One Love" and "One Race" ignoring the fact that for the last 3 years we had held the pictures of fallen youth this land over who had been killed by Black Gangs, Muslim Gangs and this didn't get any of these "patriots" motivated?

So what happened in 2010? What changed everything.

I will tell you now and this may rustle some feathers but I say it as I see it and for me thats a quality I won't spit on just to say whats "popular".

The title of this statement is Diplomatic End Game and its important because in this description of that term it will all begin to make sense.

Definition of Diplomatic End Game = The final stage of some process, the diplomatic end game resulting in the treaty. This term, dating from about 1880, comes from chess, where it denotes the stage of a game when most of the pieces have been removed from the board. In the mid-1900s it began to be transferred to other activities.

So lets take Britain and use it as the Chess Board and put all the pieces on the board and give them different names.

On one side you would have the White pieces on the other side the Black pieces and I don't mean this in reference to Race I would prefer to use the example referring the white pieces to truth and the black pieces as false.

You have BNP for example which at one time is a white piece on the board, then as that piece went forward in the game and after it crossed the halfway mark it began to get tempted by the other side. And almost like a magnet once the leadership decided it was time to join the black pieces everything and everyone without that structure has to be dragged along with it.

Or the surely once Labour ideology that saw the workhouses and factories pour out in overwhelming support at the idea that working class votes kept the economy rolling along. Which quickly found better use for its tactics on the dark side of the board.

The EDL simply started out in the middle of the board with half its structure willing on the white pieces and the other half looking toward the black pieces for instruction. The dark side of that board leads the EDL ideology and the real force of the EDL from the white side are naturally heading into a "End Game" with the black chess pieces.

Play this out in your own mind, don't simply read the words in front of you but ask yourself is this an accurate description? The National Front has a massive problem now.

We have always been the white pieces of the board, we have always seen light over darkness and that has meant we have always remained in position to defend. Defend our principles and defend our rights to voice an opinion. What we haven't done is gone forward a square, we haven't advanced we have simply held a perfect defense in our position so that the final frontier could not be conquered.
The vital error there was that many of the white pieces not only left their positions but have been drawn towards the other side of the board and with our constant hold on our ground we haven't advanced or recovered any of our team. We have in many ways left ourselves with few pieces working on our side against a whole army of chess pieces on the other side of the board, included amongst them are the most dangerous pieces and they are the ones heading back toward us with smiles only to inflict the other sides tactics upon us.

Now I hope this explanation goes some way to explain the situation. The EDL are looking at the opposing side but what they don't see is that many within the EDL are getting a cycle of orders which are coming from the opponent. The EDL for example oppose the treatment of our troops, so do we. They oppose the call for Sharia law in the British lands. So do we. They see the dangers of Islamic culture outbreeding their own and so do we. But they pretend that the answer to protecting our troops is speaking for them while they fight and have no sight of returning home, while we say that if you end the war for Israel and you end the war for grabbing of natural resources, and you stop the ideology that European lives are worth giving as long as the stock markets remain stable then you fight for truth if not... Then you only tell half truths.

If the people just stop and watch what the EDL does it can seem impressive and let me be the first to say that the courage of the youth all over this land is something we have to recognize right now. We have a chance to bring some of our chess pieces back into play, on the right side so that we have a chance to bring back the game and leave the enemy in check mate. We can only get back what is being taken if we are willing to move from our position and make moves forward. We will NOT lose that square because if the NF was done with then the police would have gladly closed down the Proud NF Remembrance Day Event something they have been itching to do. Hoping the turnout would be lower than 50 so that they didn't have to approve the funding for it.

I am 28 and those I have been around in my time are quickly telling me that its up to the next generation to "do something different" but we cannot achieve that without first recognizing that we have reached the end game if we don't pull in support and the reason we don't have that support is simply because people don't see us anywhere, ever. Once a year on mass and around the nation in dribs and drabs all year round. We make no impact.

The political fight we almost gave in to the BNP and now people are waking up and they will see the NF and come back to the roots. But we can't except that the political root is the BNP and the street activity root is the EDL? We are the people that made movements move, we gave the miners an added voice in Doncaster and Barnsley, we gave the marches against pedophiles the support, not as the NF but as fathers and mothers protecting our children. Again we need that rally cry, we need events, events and more events bit by bit each event paying for the next event, each donation from street activity going directly back to street activity. Banners we can use yearly, people on board making a task their own constant team work and effort contact with each other and progress.

When people come on the NF site they can then have events planned, locations. Things to attend and then when it comes round to the leaflet and distribution of the NF the youth may think "we had a good year, we have to put these policies forward" rather than thinking "I have no time to be a postman for free"

I don't push my luck, or disregard ANYONE I speak here to people who do care but we all know far too many who don't we all know far too many with excuses, we all know far to many who keep their head down and refuse to stand up and that mentality has to change. We all know someone who won't attend because he don't like another person attending and this means whole groups of friends don't attend because of trouble with others. That has got to end, go back to the chess board, think of what we have left of white pieces and then imagine that almost every other surviving white piece isn't even watching the next move of the enemy but instead is at war with each other. Bringing each other down and trying hard to remain "King of the castle" Its those who craved that figurehead that now have a few local EDL supporters and so they have abandoned the NF and would rather seek fame and build his own little empire based around his own personal gain in status.

The NF never stood for fame, it stood for core values and we still have a mass of support. 45% of this nation agreeing along the lines of our policies. So we still have a game of chess in front of us, we still have half a team and those we do have are leading the way to rebuild the understanding of these values.

We cannot tolerate the removal of our defenses, we should not allow the burying of our principles or the destruction of our morals simply because everyone else seems to be able to. What is right, will always be right no matter if your the last man to believe it. Just the same as truth will always outshine a lie eventually.

I thank you for reading and hope that from this comes a wave of passion, a wave of people wanting to have the same chance as I need to make the YNF a success. I can't do it alone, and therefore the fame doesn't exist for one man alone. What we can harness, what we can rebuild and what we have to save is the only reward. But to get the reward we first need to address the problem of tactics.

As a starting platform I would like to cancel the Media event for March 2011 mainly because after looking into the facts and being advised by another comrade it was figured that being in a closed off alleyway with very little hope of media attention it would be worthless. The sky news team wouldn't have made the long journey (downstairs) to address us and it would have been another failure so instead of that I want to try adopt the ideas I mentioned above and form a cross section event that can get much more coverage.

The issue that comes to mind for me has to be that most of us would be EDL members if we supported their teachings? But we don't and we are NOT EDL members. mainly because we do not believe in "One Love, One Race the Human Race" We have the basic understanding and "real respect" because we recognize that all races are different and they all have their own strengths weaknesses and expressions. We do not except that races should be wiped out, cultures removed and all replaced with one race to suit the needs of those in their ivory towers.

More importantly we reject the waving of the Israel flag in the name of British Nationalism, pretending that the nation of Israel has care for us when it is the very same ideology they spread throughout the EU that is sending the troops of this proud nation to die. We are no safer, we simply breed home grown terrorists to preserve the wealth of the United States, we are at risk from this homegrown Islamic militant because we have controlled governments who fight wars in nations (risking British lives) for the gain of a few select corporations and the EDL basically fuel the anger and put the nation at even more risk.

Do NOT spit at our troops, do NOT kill our people, do NOT build your mega mosques!
But don't allow the EDL to openly support terrorism in Arab nations in our name, do NOT let the Israelis put the British forward as the "oppressor" STOP LETTING THEM USE US AS LAMBS TO THE SLAUGHTER!

We bring our troops home when we reject the war, we bring them home for good. No more dying for liars no more dying for the controllers who care little for your life. The soldiers are heroes, but they are also being deceived and lied to about why they fight and if they said NO the nation is behind them. We want them home, not fighting more wars as they explode in the middle east. British serviceman are NOT lemmings for Israeli power and we are not expendable to help pay Americas debts.

So I put forward a suggestion, around June/July we hold a "No More War For Israel" event. Central London. Of course this has to be cleared and hopefully it will be.

I cannot operate with small amounts of people in pockets of the nation, every comrade involved will know when we have an event we lack support from outside the local area and that has to change because then... and only then will the youth have an alternative.

I thank those who support the National Front and feel happy to know that many older wiser people are in front of me, but the concern is that we don't have that same commitment and hope ahead.

Danny Brown

Young National Front

"Bulldog Can't Bite With Gums"

On this day 28th February (Remember Serbia)

In 1994 NATO takes its first military action, shooting down four Bosnian Serb aircraft violating a "UN no-fly zone" over central Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Serbs belong to the Southslavonic group of Indo-European peoples. As their tradition, culture, language, beliefs, and customs show, the ethnogenesis of Serbs goes far back into the past. Serbian ancestors, Protoslavs and Old Serbs, were described in the 5th century BC by Herodotus, under the names of Neuri and Budini, living north of the Danube in the region between Dniepar and north-eastern Carpathian Mountains.

The first mention of the name "Serbs" appears in the 1st century BC (69- 75), in the Historia naturalis by Plinius Caecilius Secundus, who states that Serbs (Serbi) live on the coast of the Black Sea. In the 2nd century, Claudius Ptolomaius writes in his Geographica that Serbs (Serboi, Sirboi - Serboi, Sirboi) live behind the Caucasus, near the hinterland of the Black Sea. The first mention of the Serbian name on their present ethnical location appears in 822, in the work of Frank chronicler Einhardt (Annales regni Francorum). He confirms that Serbs are very numerous in Dalmatia.

During the great migrations in Europe (5th to 6th century), Serbian ancestors arrive to the Balkan Peninsula from several directions and settle in the wide area between four seas (Black, Adriatic, Aegean, and Ionian). It is on this location that the eldest Serbian feudal states Raska (later Serbia) and Duklja (later Zeta or Montenegro) were formed. From the second half of the 12th century Raska expanded by taking over the Byzantine territory. The medieval Serbian state reached the height of power under the rule of Nemanjic dynasty (1166-1371). From 1217 Serbia was a kingdom, and from 1346 an empire. The Serbian Orthodox Church acquired independence in 1219, thanks to its first Archbishop St. Sava Nemanjic (1175-1235), a man of wide education, who inspired the revival of Serbian literature, education, law and medicine. The medieval Serbian state was most powerful during the reign of Emperor Dusan Nemanjic, who consolidated the legal system of the empire by his Law issued in 1349 (with additions of 1354). Medieval Serbian art, architecture, and fresco painting have been included into the World Cultural Heritage, sponsored by UNESCO (monasteries Sopocani, Mileseva, Studenica).

An invasion by the Turks at the end of the 14th century cut short the development of Serbian countries, and they fell under Turkish occupation after the battles of Marica (1371) and Kosovo (1389). The occupation was completed by the end of the 15th century and it lasted for several centuries. The Turkish occupation was one of the most tragic periods in the Serbian history. Serbian population was heavily taxed (harach) to support the Turkish imperial machinery. But even more tragic was the blood tax (danak u krvi) when pre teenage boys were separated by force from their parents to be raised as Turkish soldiers (janicari), and pretty young Serbian girls were taken to harems.

Today the Young National Front remembers our Serbian Brothers and Sisters and calls on European nations to stand defiant against the Zionist control of our Military and Governments.

We stand with our Serbian people to say NO MORE BROTHERWARS!

Middle Ages Serbia Video

Wednesday, February 23, 2011

The Sheep Effect!

Now after many years understanding "Racial Differences" it is easy for me to say that I am led by both head and heart in the choices I make with life, but I don't feel the same can be said for those just finding their feet in this way of life.

I fear with have a huge problem within our struggle and that problem is that many are affected by the very same sheep mentality we condemn. Let me explain.

We are all well aware that the media tell huge numbers of lies or mis-truths in order to convince the masses or lure them toward a thought pattern that suits the "masters agenda" We are also fully aware that lies and deception are a part of everyday life for those who control us.

The big problem comes when those who are being lied to get sick of the lies. Find the truth and then within that circle of truth they again come in to contact with liars and cheats. Those who left the world of lies and joined the BNP found truth and reality and felt as though it would be that way forever but eventually Nick Griffin lied to the people who had trusted him. He lied to John Tyndall and left the man with nothing and nowhere to turn. The media did their number on Tyndall almost at the end of his life and Griffin showed him the door. When the media wrote "Good Riddance" the day after Tyndalls death Griffin did nothing to honour his name, he did nothing to condemn the media and many still supported Griffin even after such an act of dishonour.

Why? I blame the "Sheep Effect"

Example 2

Comrade (A) falls out with Comrade (B) and c - z then fall out bit by bit in order to choose a side. Either (A) or (B) it turns out that both had really let the team down and both should equally be to blame but all that matters now is the end result. Half of those people no longer speak to the other half because they took a moment to choose a side and the end result of that was that the two original people to fall out are the best of friends once more while the rest have to work at months/years of building bridges just to make things as strong as they had already once been.

Why? I blame the "Sheep Effect"

Okay so a final example.

A bunch of lads who marched with the NF and other Nationalist groups over the years proclaimed their loyalty to their cause. No one forced them to make this commitment by none the less they stood tall and firm over the years. When the reds came in numbers they stood and fought no matter if they win or lose. When the enemy came in the form of Brixton they stood their ground and they walked away with more pride and valour. They stood tall against the enemy countless times and then one day the very enemy they had been studying became the same enemy they marched with.

These once proud white men and women decided that marching with the Black, Gay, Jewish groups was "easier" they didn't have to do anything other than stand in the flock and make a few sounds. "bah, bah " was normally enough. They didn't have to answer to anybody and they didn't have to fight a battle because now they had a slaughter on a plate handed to them by the very enemy they once saw clearly.

Why? I blame the "Sheep Effect"


Okay enough examples and on with the point. I consider the "Sheep Effect" anything where people simply follow without question. When I say ANYTHING I mean absolutely anything in your life that you are willing to simply jump into is something you have no fully considered and in ALL likely hood that will result in you committing only a fraction of your life to that thought pattern or ideology.

If you are a Black Supremacist and your leadership says 95% of things that you agree with you might just get so used to nodding your head and raising your hand in acceptance that with just a slight slip of concentration you are agreeing with something you most certainly would not have supported (Race Mixing) for a big example had you not become a victim of the "sheep effect"

If you are involved in the struggle to preserve the white race, or even as an example a follower of what I write and week after week article after article you agree with me whole heartedly. NEVER open up the next part of my blog with the "Sheep effect" and simply accept what I say before you have even read the words. To only think with your head and think quick and make your choice is the wrong move for ANY aspect of our lives. We need to ALWAYS think and really think until we say to ourselves "I have thought this through, and I am sure" because if you are only half sure then it is 100% scientifically proven that you will only have half the commitment to the task, only half your mind will consider your option and therefore only half of your mind can operate the task.

It is one thing for the enemy to try this "Sheep Effect" but it should NOT exist within the struggle we face and in reality when you are seeking the "truth" about anything in life you can't be led to the truth you have to find your own way. Ask questions by all means, educate yourselves most certainly but NEVER let ANYONE not even those closest to you guide you into ANY choice that ultimately will only affect your life, your present and your future.

Now without sounding like too much of a "paranoid person" I feel that this "Sheep Effect" is deeply rooted in all walks of life and of my own concern that effect is rooted throughout the very "Movement" I move in. I know of people struggling with this effect within my own struggle and I certainly have close family members who I care for deeply who have only a glimpse of reality and live in this sheep effect state almost their entire lives.

When I watch my own Brothers "Play the game of life" and I know they depend so much on the outcome of "Lady Luck" it makes me feel an anger for the system built around them that made them this way. I don't shift blame and I am well aware they are grown men who make choices but what real choices to we have? Birth, School, Work, Old, Die! What time do we have in between all of that?

Birth-Illness-School-Vaccinations-Programming-Work-Slave-Withdraw-Spend-Save-Borrow-Starve-Struggle-Age-Wither-Regret-Die.


Thats a reality (a little pesamistic) I agree but almost as real as it gets for anyone and everyone. The real aim in order to change any of that is to look at what happened just after Aging and withering away. Just before the end comes many people are left with a few last questions to themselves. Did I do all that I wanted to do, did I achieve all that I could and that leads to the final question which a dying man surely only ever answers honestly to himself. Do I have any regrets.

If we use the idea that before we let the sheep effect kick in we think something through then in the end we shall eliminate the need to regret. "Example" You have a row with your parents/partner and it gets heated and you say something off the bat and half hour later no one is talking to anyone and normally you think what? "I shouldn't have said that" or something along those lines and thats the most basic of examples. If we are dedicated to our race and nation then we have to be thinking with our head and our heart and those are the comrades that have become my best of friends and brothers over the many years. Once you and you alone control your head then its much easier for the head and heart to work as a team rather than against each other.

I have met many young comrades, some who were at some time very close friends of mine who always seemed to be in this fight because their head was telling them they should stand with us. Today they are not here, they left they decided that life was too complicated and the added "Burdon of Nationalism" was too much to handle. That is why I say that if you can't rule your head then you certainly wont find the heart for this struggle. You have to find your own mind and be sure this struggle is your calling otherwise you will be of no use to anyone and your race will simply suffer at your lack of commiment.

That may sound harsh but those reading are those with heart already. They are those who understand that you have to stand for each and every principle you follow and stand equally as strongly against those rules and regualtions or forms of ideology that you do not accept. If you think something needs to be brought into modent times you need to say this, don't simply walk around dressed a certain way because you have been led by a "sheep effect"

You can put a man with shaved head, bomber jacket, dr martin boots and pair of braces stood next to a man wearing blue jeans white shirt, pair of shoes and another man wearing a suit and tie. My question is simple which one is the proudest white amongst them?

The answer is judge that for yourself. Get to know them and judeg simply for yourself. Who can you work with, who has their thinking cap on, who knows why he fights and for what he fights. Its not mastermind stuff it is simply thinking with our own minds and judging those amongst our own people with our own mind. Don't get drawn into sheep effect where 1 person says this group are scum so that means every single comrade the world over who may have ended up involved in that particular group (maybe only group in their area) is scum also. Or that if you meet a comrade for a beer and a chat and you think he seems to be decent enough, then a month later after meeting him many times and thinking he is a decent comrade you read something online about him and so you join in with the masses so you don't stand out yourself.


WE ARE WHITE PRIDE, WE NATURALLY STAND OUT IN THIS WORLD TODAY SO GET USED TO IT!

ITS NOT GOING TO GET ANY EASIER WITH THE AMOUNT OF SHEEP WE DEAL WITH!

We can't be divided anymore, if we split and seperate anymore then I fear it will be game over for the UK Nationalist movement as a whole and I am and have been my entire journey willing to work alongside those who want to change this sheepish mentality. My mission is to break this sheep spell and give people a small glimpse of a light that I believe they will walk towards. Not like a light in a religious sense but in the sense that they will look at truth and demand more of it.

If you literally turned this scenario to sheep and look how man has already got sheep going where they want, when they want and they do this with a few dogs and thats it. The sheep is the masses and the dogs are the fear the system uses to control us, but if 1 single sheep steps out of line it will create a chain reaction because naturally sheep will follow the leader and eventually they wont want to follow the leader. To a certain point the sheep would follow the leader toward new possibility and then the sheep along that new path would gain the knowledge and will to find their own path further down the road.

Surely if we can take sheep and compare in such fine detail our control, our lives and our destiny then we can't be very far from the "cattle" we are described as by the enemy. I am not happy with seeing people herded like cattle, I cannot believe that over just 2 generations this cattle process of our mind has been almost perfected and meanwhile we have embraced a "Sheep Effect" or "cattle Mentality" within our own fight for survival. Your political leadership speaks you nod your head, boss tells you what to do and how to do it and you nod your head, school tells you your children must spend their child life in a class being taught what to think and what to feel and we nod our heads, governments have prior knowledge of terrorism and in some cases plot and carry our covert attacks in order to give us more cameras and more laws and we nod our heads.

We cannot truly fight this enemy under ANY banner if we are not even willing to put the gloves on. For the last 12 years I would guess I have met maybe 400 people in the UK and today I can truly say that I know 20 who fight with head and heart. I know another 20 who fight with head over heart and the remaining 360?
Your guess is as good as mine, they came they went and they never came back.

Why? Because they came in without thinking about it. They thought they could help but they made matters worse. They thought they had commitment but they were wrong. They fooled themselves into thinking they could handle the hardship and pace but they fell before the first hurdle. They said they would fight for the land and the people and then they walked down British streets waving Stars of David the symbol that represents 28 British citizens murdered on 22nd July 1946.

Tommy openly stands by this enemy, this terrorist nation and he does so with his head and his heart. He has fully considered his commitment to Zionists and he is willing to serve them. The rest of the EDL I would have to say have no clue what the Star of David represents and if they did they would quickly refuse to wave it or support it at "English Cultural Protection" events!

So my point is really to all those new to this movement and maybe those reading can pass on this information for others. "If you agree with what I have wrote that is" Otherwise leave me some comments because I know people read by never get to read any comments and the good thing with the comments section is it pops up right at end of article so your oppinion is fresh in your mind...

And before any reds reading claim that I just contradicted myself think about it moron? If someone reads the whole article then they think about what is being said and judge it at the end! Thought process complete no "Sheeps" on this blog.

WE ALL SEE VERY CLEARLY!







Sunday, February 20, 2011

Missing Links - The Definitive Truth about 9-11

MISSING LINKS is the first movie to expose the identity of the criminals responsible for 9/11.

Now you will discover the definitive truth about 9/11 and learn why even the most popular movies on the subject have failed to address the evidence exhaustively presented in this video. The facts will make it abundantly clear that the so-called 9/11 “Truth” movement has been infiltrated and is ultimately controlled by the same criminals who orchestrated the attacks.

As they say, 'if you want to control the dissent you lead the dissent.'

Culminating evidence from the FBI, CIA, NSA, US Armed Forces Intelligence sectors, Foreign Intelligence organizations, local law enforcement agencies and independent investigators, Missing Links goes where no other 9/11 video has dared to.

Israel - Founded by and living on Terror!

The following is a brilliant article written by Ted Pike.

Zionist-dominated mainstream media vividly portrays Israel as a tiny embattled nation seeking peace in a sea of Arab hostility. 1 Arabs, we are told, commit acts of terror while Israel only resorts to violence out of self-protection. The facts of history paint a very different picture.

Far from deploring terror, Israel has sanctioned terror to seize and expand its territory since its beginnings. In 1944, Zionist leaders in Israel faced two alternatives. They could continue to allow the British and Arabs to occupy Palestine, who would continue to pressure Israel to concede a Palestinian state. Or they could drive both British and Arabs out. Israelis chose the latter.

Members of the Zionist ruling elite and their clandestine terrorist enforcers - the Jewish Agency, Hagana, Irgun and the Stern Gang - began to exert every possible terrorist means to dominate Palestine. Their strategy was simple: the more respectable Zionist establishment would take the "high road" and officially disavow terrorism.



Meanwhile, Zionist terrorists would commit any crime needed to disrupt British occupation and to panic Arabs into flight. The Encyclopedia of the Palestine Problem, available in most university libraries, documents from British records more than five hundred violent or terrorist incidents against Palestinians and the British occupation between 1939 and 1948. These included bombings, booby traps and landmines, kidnappings and torture of prisoners, bank robberies, murders of Arabs, and assassinations of police and British officials. 2

Chief terrorists were David Ben-Gurion, Menachem Begin, Yitzhak Shamir and later, Ariel Sharon. Begin headed Irgun, and Shamir led the Stern Gang. They cooperated intimately with the highest political body of the Zionist establishment, the Jewish Agency, and the popular Zionist resistance army, Hagana. Ben-Gurion headed Hagana and later the Jewish Agency. 3

After 1944 - when Ben-Gurion formally rejected the British plan for partition of Palestine into Jewish/Arab states - most Israelis, particularly the young, favored expulsion of British and Arabs.

Here is the short list of Zionist atrocities from 1944 to the present:

*

Assassination of Lord Moyne on November 6, 1944.

Under orders from Yitzhak Shamir, terrorists of the Stern Gang shot Lord Moyne, British resident minister. Purpose: To drive the British from Palestine.

*

The King David massacre, July 22, 1946.

Begin's Irgun terrorists, with encouragement from Ben-Gurion's Hagana, blew up the King David Hotel in Jerusalem, murdering 92. Purpose: Destroy British records that proved the highest members of the Zionist government backed anti-British terrorism. 4

*

British sergeants hanged, July 12, 1947.

Begin, Shamir, and Haganah authorized kidnapping and hanging of two British sergeants, booby trapping their bodies and mining the area. During this time, Shamir sent many letters and package bombs to British officials. 1947 also included multiple cases of kidnappings (including brutal floggings of British soldiers) by Jewish terrorists.

*

The Semiramis Hotel massacre, January 5, 1948.

Jewish Agency leader David Ben-Gurion and Haganah leaders blew up the Seramis Hotel in Jerusalem, killing 20 and wounding 17. Purpose: Terrorize Arabs into fleeing Israel. 5

*

Deir Yassin massacre, April 9, 1948.

Begin's Irgun soldiers killed 250 sleeping Arab villagers at Deir Yassin, a suburb of Jerusalem.


o

"25 pregnant women were bayoneted in their abdomens while still alive. 52 children were maimed under the eyes of their mothers and then were slain and their heads cut off." 6
o

"Menachem Begin, the leader of the Irgun gang, himself admitted on December 28, 1950 in a press interview in New York, that the Deir Yassin incident had been carried out in accordance with an agreement between the Irgun and the Jewish Agency and Haganah." 7



Begin was always proud of what he had done, considering Deir Yassin a legitimate military target. Irgun trucks drove throughout Judea, announcing by loudspeaker to hundreds of thousands of Arabs that unless they fled Israel they would meet the same fate. Deir Yassin and subsequent terrorist acts precipitated flight of more than 800,000 Arabs from Palestine. In town after town Zionist soldiers drove Palestinians out, usually killing any person who delayed or attempted to take any possessions with them. Arab towns were bulldozed, replaced with Jewish communities. 8



Begin comments on the level of Palestinian terror generated by Irgun's massacre at Deir Yassin.


o

"Out of evil, however, good came. This Arab propaganda spread a legend of terror amongst Arabs and Arab troops, who were seized with panic at the mention of Irgun soldiers. The legend was worth a dozen battalions to the forces of Israel." 9



Israel exiled these unfortunates to concentration camps in Lebanon, the West Bank, and Gaza, refusing to allow them repossession of their land and property or adequate compensation. 10 This is the seminal cause of international Arab terrorism and the Mid-East conflict that rages today.

*

Assassination of UN mediator Count Folke Bernadotte, September 17, 1948.

This killing by the Stern Gang was on orders of Shamir. Purpose: To sabotage UN efforts to create a Palestinian state.

*

Massacre at Dawayma, October 29, 1948.

Israeli soldiers killed between 80 and 100 men, women, and children in Dawayma, a suburb of Haifa. Purpose: Intensify terror generated by Deir Yassin and compel the remaining Palestinians to leave Israel. 11

*

Massacre at Kibya, October 14, 1953.

In an atrocity condoned by the highest levels of the Israeli government and military, Ariel Sharon led 700 crack paratroopers to attack the Jordanian town of Kibya. They slaughtered 75 innocent men, women, and children primarily by locking families in their homes and blowing them up. 12 Purpose: Collective punishment to avenge the alleged killing of a single Jewish family.

*

Massacre of Kafr Kassim, October 29, 1956.

51 men, women, and children were murdered by Israeli troops as they returned to their villages in the evening after work. 13 more were severely wounded by the gunfire. Purpose: Terrorize Palestinians into not siding with Egypt in case of war. 13

*

Massacre of USS Liberty, June 8, 1967.

Israel's jet fighters and torpedo boats repeatedly attempted to sink US intelligence monitoring vessel USS Liberty during the 1967 Israel/Egypt war. They killed 34 and wounded 171 American sailors. Purpose: Minister of Defense Moshe Dayan ordered the attack ostensibly to protect Israel's intelligence communications, even though the war was virtually over. 14

*

Libyan airliner massacre, February 21, 1973.

Straying over Israeli-controlled Sinai air space, a Libyan 727 commercial airliner was intercepted by Israeli fighters and, despite the clearest identification, shot down, killing 106. Purpose: Flexing Zionist power against Libya. 15

*

Massacre in Sabra and Shatila refugee camps, Beirut, Lebanon, September 23, 1982.

Gen. Ariel Sharon and Yitshak Shamir, in cooperation with "Christian" Phalangist forces sealed all exits and provided aerial flares, illuminating the slaughter of up to 2750 men, women, and children, according to a body count by the committee of the Red Cross. Purpose: collective punishment of Palestinians. 16



What About Arab Terrorism?

It was inevitable that Zionism's threatened and actual expulsion of Arabs from land the Arabs occupied from the seventh century should incur hostility ­ even terrorism. Jews of Hebron were massacred by Arabs in 1929. The Arab revolt in Palestine beginning in 1936 resulted in acts of violence against many Jews, followed by anti-Jewish mistreatment during the 1948 war. Suicide bombings and rocket attacks continue against Israel in recent years.

Who is most at fault?

Consider this: If someone, claiming divine right to occupy your house and land, drives you from them, condemning you and your children to a distant, arid concentration camp for generations, would you resort to violence?

There is only one word that describes the one who displaced you. Aggressor. The Palestinians, fanatical and terrorist as many have become, are nevertheless defenders of ancient rights and territories that have been horrifically violated.

They are victims hitting back.

MY THOUGHTS


I think while reading this two things, one I remember that I am a racialist and that invaders of my land for me cannot be tolerated. The survival of my heritage and culture and race are of paramount importance to me.

I also believe that the truth is the only way we can truly set ourselves free and when I consider the "Palestinian Question" It is obvious to me that Palestine was and is a land that belongs to Arabs, the culture built up over generations is Arab and the land and resources on that land therefore belong only to the Palestinians.

I cannot claim the right to my free land and free race and nation and at the same time ignore the right of another to what is rightfully his. Just as I cannot claim to love my race while trying to deny that other races exist. Other races do of course exist and it is only the media image that tries to paint us as uneducated that tries to pretend we do not recognize other races on the earth.

We as Racialists/Nationalists or what ever label your happy to carry have always understood that races existed. While the control tried to silence debate on race the white race was looking extensively at racial difference and making much sense of it. When we tried to point out out findings many years ago it simply did not suit the agenda of the "Elite" to reveal this information. It was viewed more dangerous than Darwins theory of evolution. For racial difference to be shown meant that people would quickly notice these differences and the whole idea of a "multi racial utopia" would fall at the first hurdle.

I have been racially aware for more than 10 years, and I was a Nationalist for about 2 years before I had what I consider my racial awakening. I will always carry pride in my nation and I shall always consider my nation sacred to me. But in all honesty my racial pride doesn't except boundaries on a political level. I don't see a line on a map between myself and my comrades in Scotland and I don't consider my Brothers in Serbia or Romania to be distant alien people. They are my kinsman, they are my relatives and my family. They are the same line of warriors and poets that have left a mark across this entire continent of Europe. European people to me all folk.

As I am able to clearly see the creation of Europe at the hands of my folk I can also clearly see a culture and faith and way of life in Palestine that belongs solely to the people who carved that culture and legacy over many generations. I don't have to confuse the Palestine fight for freedom with what is going on here at home because for me a "Nationalist or Racialist" must defend his own culture and heritage only. The Muslim I see standing on the streets of Britain demanding his way and his rights is neither a nationalist or a racialist because if he was he would take himself from a land his culture has no place in and he would defend his people and their culture from the enemy that invades them.

I would make the assumption that in order to be a Muslim "Patriot" you MUST defend the lands of your culture and people and that land is many miles from Bradford or Oldham.

So I consider a man in his land with his people no threat to my race, unless of course we speak about resources on the earth but again this is a complex discussion which gets into greed and production for greed and the fact that we as Europeans can well and truly preserve ALL that we use and have to last us for all times.

The rate at which we use stuff now is solely down to business and much of what we bottle, package and shelf simply expires and is disposed of.

So supporting Palestine with vocal support for me isn't hard in the slightest. If someone within the white struggle asked me tomorrow if I supported the cause of Palestine I will gladly admit that support. But let me make something clear my support goes no further than vocal support. I have no intention of fighting for another culture, I have no ambition to defend anyone but my fellow kinsman and his family. Palestine requires the support of the kinsman of those lands and I believe that only true Patriotism can be claimed by those who stick around to fight the battle of survival.

A British nationalist for example who spends countless hours talking about the dangers of multicultural Britain and demands that his fellow man stand up and defend the land from hordes of enemies... from his laptop in his bedroom in Australia has no backbone and certainly no right to claim a pride or a passion because he has already abandoned ship and left others to drown. Just as an Australian talking the same revolutionary needs for Australia from his beach house in Thailand would have no validity to his fight.

A Palestinian refugee living in the UK chanting his rights and religion on the streets of Britain is surely two faced to say the least. They claim that the people in the lands suffer and they claim that they are appalled by this hatred but they remain at home in Northern England and live a western lifestyle. They have in many ways left behind their true identity and replaced it for an identity they claim destroys the values of life. You can't raise the banner of Palestine while standing on the streets of London. Your impact will be zero. The Zionists in control of the British government will NOT listen to the call of Palestine but the change that approaches Europe WILL give the land back to the rightful people and I hope that in years to come Britain will withdraw her recognition for the state of Israel and this will in turn secure our land from the threat of Islamic extremism.

I do NOT want and will NEVER EXCEPT an Islamic state anywhere in Europe, just the same I do not want an unstable middle east and truly wish that European Zionism would quickly be crushed so that European - Middle East trade could be settled just as it should have been prior to World war 2. I do NOT support European Islam and actually consider ALL European Muslims to be doing to upmost damage to their own lands and allowing a brutal regime to imprison their people while they sit in homes in North England living western lives day by day only to occasionally protest for Palestinian rights.

Where I come from you prove your loyalty to your people and culture by standing shoulder to shoulder with them through the bad times and the good.

The Muslims in Europe are most certainly NOT shoulder to Shoulder with their comrades and are instead playing into the Zionist hands and angering a European peoples that have shown Islam in the past what happens in conflict with our people.

I consider pride in your people a natural gift from birth, its not something you need to learn, or at least it wasn't something we had to learn until the Zionist agenda decided that removal of national and racial identity had many positives including making man more easy to control. If we had no race, no identity, no history, no culture, no legacy then we had nothing to be proud of and above all else we had nothing to fight to survive. This huge empty void is basic the end of this ideology that today literally controls all people of all the world other than the few far off tribes in places like the Arctic who although suffer harsh realities of survival are truly free human beings in every sense of the word. (Sometimes the thought of being with a select few of my kinsmen alone in the wilderness away from all influence that has corrupted and destroyed the fabric and moral of my race seems like an oppotunity I would snap up in a heart beat.

Muslims holding up the "Islam, Future Of Britain" signs have played into Zionist hands and now the EDL is trying to feed our youth out of the other Zionist hand.

I end with a saying that comes to mind and I say this equally to both Muslims and my own Kinsman. They say you should never bite off the hand that feeds you, but what if they hand is feeding you poison?

Thanks for reading....

Do Jews Own Hollywood?

Do the Zionist Jews own Hollywood and the media?

Are they using the media to mold and shape American opinion by constantly injecting Zionist propaganda and bias into news programs, movies, television shows, even children's cartoons and entertainment?

The answer is so blatantly "Yes!" that you wouldn't think these questions are even worth pursuing.

But recently, the untoward comments of a patriot talk show host made me stop and rethink it. Are there people out there-even in the Patriot Movement-who really are that much in the dark, who deny Jewish influence in the media?

Recently, when a caller to a talk show suggested that the Jews control the media, the host went wild. He raged on and on, playing the race card. He branded the surprised caller and others like him who are weary of Zionist influence "Nazis" and "anti-Semites."

Angrily, he denied Jewish involvement in any conspiracies and ridiculed those who had the audacity to suggest that Jews run Hollywood or the media. Then, in a real fit of spewed venom, the talk show host demanded that the caller and all others who believe like him should go out and hang themselves to promote population reduction.

As if that wasn't hateful enough, the pro-Zionist host then stated that all the "Nazis and Anti-Semites" who opposed Zionism and the Jews should plug in an electric toaster, hold it to their naked bodies, jump into a bathtub filled with water, and have a party." In other words, kill themselves.
Quite a rampage by the supposedly "patriot" talk show host. And all because the poor caller had dared to propose undue Jewish influence over the media.

Hearing the actual taped broadcast of this unbelievable tirade by a pro-Zionist advocate confirmed my resolve to inform good folks once again of the truly dictatorial grip that Zionist Jews have on the media.

The best way to do this is not to rage and spew venom, but simply to present the facts, to document the truth of Jewish control of the media.


What Do Knowledgeable Jews Say?

How about going to top Jews in the media themselves and see what they say? Take Joel Stein, for example, columnist for the Los Angeles Times newspaper and regular contributor to Time magazine.

In his column in the LA Times (Dec. 19, 2008), Stein says that Americans who think the Jews do not control Hollywood and the media are just plain "dumb."
"Jews totally run Hollywood," Stein proudly admits.

He then goes on to provide a long, long list of Hollywood/media chieftains-all Jews!-to prove his point.

On his list:

Fox News President Peter Chernin

Paramount Pictures Chairman Brad Grey

Walt Disney CEO Robert Igor

Sony Pictures Chairman Michael Lynton

Warner Brothers Chairman Barry Meyer

CBS CEO Leslie Moonves

MGM Chairman Harry Sloan

NBC/Universal Studios CEO Jeff Zucker

That's just the top brass at the studios.


Then there are the actors and entertainers - predominantly Jews, from Barbra Streisand and Gwyneth Paltrow, from Adam Sandler to Ben Stiller... Jew, Jew and Jew again.

As Stein wryly remarks, even the head of the Actors' Union, the Screen Actors Guild, Alan Rosenberg, is a Jew.
"The Jews are so dominant," writes Stein, "I had to scour the trades to come up with six Gentiles in high positions at entertainment companies."

"But lo and behold," Stein says, "even one of that six, AMC President Charles Collier, turned out to be a Jew!"

"As a proud Jew," says Joel Stein, "I want America to know of our accomplishment. Yes, we control Hollywood."


ADL's Foxman Admits Jewish Control

Stein says he then called Abe Foxman, Chairman of the Jewish ADL, to ask him, why don't more Jews just come out and boast at this great accomplishment? Foxman responded by admitting that yes, it's true that most of the top execs "happen to be Jewish."

In fact, Foxman told Stein,

"all eight major film studios are run by men who happen to be Jewish."
Ben Stein (no relation to Joel), the well-known Jewish actor, economic commentator and writer, when asked "Do Jews run Hollywood?" stared blankly at the questioner, then retorted,

"You bet they do - and what of it?"

Shahar Ilan, writing in haaretz.com, the internet division of Israel's top daily newspaper, commented,

"The Jews do control the American media. This is very clear, and claiming otherwise is an insult to common knowledge."

Neal Gabler, also a Jew and a noted media researcher, wrote an entire book outlining Jewish control of Hollywood. It was entitled, An Empire of Their Own: How the Jews Invented Hollywood.

But to really see how the Jews, in their own publications and press, view the reality of Jewish control of the media, all one has to do is take a look at a recent issue of the Jewish Daily Forward, which featured an article entitled, "Billionaire Boychiks Battle for Media Empire."

Billionaire Jews Battle for Media

This fascinating, look-see article discussed how the Jews had for decades owned the media and now were competing; that is, vying, to buy one of America's most powerful media companies, Tribune Company, which owns 23 television stations, a baseball team, and many major newspapers, including the Chicago Tribune and the Los Angeles Times.

"However, it turns out," gloated the Jewish mag, "we'll have a Jew in charge of the (LA) Times, which was once one of old Los Angeles' most famous WASP (White Anglo Saxon Protestant) institutions. What a great day for old LA Jews"

The publication noted that among the Jewish billionaires ("boychiks") vying for the Tribune media empire is,

"Liberal, Jewish, media mogul David Geffen."

And who, pray tell, is the current owner of the Tribune Company? Why, that would be Jewish billionaire Sam Zell. Zell is a major donor to Israeli, Zionist and Jewish causes.

His own rabbi proudly reports that Zell is,

"a committed Zionist, a generous supporter of Israel, and a member in good standing of the synagogue."

Asked who his own favorite newspaper columnists were, Zell quickly answered,

"Charles Krauthammer, Thomas Friedman, and David Brooks."

Surprise!

The trio are all ardent Zionist whack-jobs who clamor over each other demanding the U.S. attack Iran, provide billions more in foreign aid to favored nation Israel, and so forth.

Local Newspapers Owned by Foreign Agents

So powerful is the Jewish control over the media that Nathanael Kapner, a rare Jew who converted to Christianity and now is adept at reporting these things, asserts that no longer can we trust our local daily newspaper.

"Zionist Jews have taken over the 'local newspaper' in America," Kapner writes.

Indeed he explains that there basically is no local newspaper anymore, because,

"Most local newspapers are owned by companies controlled by Zionists whose offices are hundreds of miles away."

Kapner provides manifold evidence of Zionists' dominating control of the media at all levels.

The Newhouse Empire of the Jewish brothers Samuel, Donald, and Theodore Newhouse, Kapner says,

"illustrates the insatiable appetite for opinion control."

"Today, the Newhouse Empire owns 40 local newspapers across the U.S.A. These include the Newark Star Ledger, the Cleveland Plain Dealer, the Portland Oregonian, and the St. Louis Globe-Democrat."

Then, there are the vast array of magazines run by the Jewish Newhouse family - including:

The New Yorker

Vogue

Golf Digest

Glamour

Gentleman's Quarterly (GQ)

the massively circulated newspaper insert, Parade magazine

Jewish Media Spew Out Pro-Zionist Propaganda

The fact that Zionists control virtually every media outlet in America is no doubt why the American citizenry hears only one version of events in the Middle East-the pro-Jew, pro-Israeli side.

This led Dr. Kevin MacDonald, professor at California State University, to write:

"In the contemporary world, organized American Jewish lobbying groups and deeply committed Jews in the media are behind the pro-Israel U.S. foreign policy that is leading to war against virtually the entire Arab world."

This Zionist bias and propaganda spin by the Jewish-owned American media is not new.

As far back as 1978, the noted Jewish political writer Alfred Lillienthal, in his revealing book, The Zionist Connection, stated:

"The most effective component of Jewish connection is probably that of media control. It is well known that American opinion molders have long been largely influenced by a handful of powerful newspapers, including the New York Times, the Washington Post, and the St. Louis-Post Dispatch (All Jewish Families)."

To further illustrate the breadth of Jewish media control, we note that Jewish magnate Arthur Sulzberger's media empire today includes not only the New York Times (which, in Stalin's day, systematically covered up the genocidal crimes of Jewish commissars in Communist USSR), but also:

The Boston Globe

the Lexington Dispatch (NC)

the Gainesville Sun (FL)

the Ocala Star Banner (FL)

the Tuscaloosa News (AL)

the Spartansburg Herald Journal (SC)

the Santa Barbara News Press (CA)

Each of the newspapers Lillienthal mentioned back in 1978, in turn, owned and still owns dozens of others. So tainted is the news because of this that almost every newspaper in America endorsed President George Bush's radically pro-Israel policies in the Middle East, including Israel's savage butchery of Lebanon and Palestine.

There can be no doubt. It is easy for us to document the massive dominance over the media by evil Jewish shills who are continually hostile to pure American interests while, everyday, unabashedly spewing out reams of misleading Zionist propaganda.

Time magazine

Newsweek

NBC

ABC

CBS

CNN

FOX,
...and many, many more are all owned or run by Jews and operated solely to further the aims of the traitorous, anti-American, ever-growing Zionist World Empire.


All America is in the Grip of the Hidden, Red Iron Fist of Zionism

Of course, the media, even as important as it is to our culture, is only a bit piece of the whole that is now, regrettably, under the big thumbs of the Jewish Zionist elite.

our Educational Establishment

Wall Street

the banks

The Federal Reserve


The United States Congress

the White House (just consider Rahm Emanuel, the Zionist Israeli freak who is Obama's White House Chief of Staff)

USA judiciary,

...each and every one is infiltrated by Zionist radicals who put Israel and their own "Chosen People" first, to the detriment of everything in America.

So, the next time you hear some ignorant rube on talk radio or elsewhere shoving the race card in your face and ranting and raving about "Nazis" and "anti-Semites" who "claim" the Jews control the media, why don't you just reach out and turn that radio dial to another place. And please, don't forget to also let the radio network and station manager know of your displeasure.

The fact is that the dishonest Zionist shills out there promoting Zionist lies, drivel, and nonsense truly deserve our contempt.

THIS SHORT CLIP SPEAKS VOLUME!



When a Rockefeller says something publicly, you can bet he doesn’t just express his humble personal opinion but speaks on behalf of the Family. You can also be sure that his every word reflects a decision already made, corresponding measures defined, and detailed instructions on their implementation sent to the stooges at the lower levels of the pyramid. So when on March 18, 2009, the US senator Jay Rockefeller claimed that the internet is the biggest threat to US national security and that “it should have never existed,” it was not just his point of view, it was an instruction: let the long prepared war on the free internet begin!

Nothing is and ever was a bigger threat to US national and the whole world security than the Rockefellers themselves. The alternative media, which have grown from strength to strength on the internet in recent years, make this fact more and more evident. The free internet is a fast growing threat to the power of these very inventors and absolute world champions of organized crime. Not the internet in general, as Jay Rockefeller claims. It is the internet of free, independent and uncensored opinions that they would prefer to have “never invented.”

To simply switch the entire World Wide Web off is virtually impossible — the bankers and the military would be the first losers. This is why, to end up with the alternative online media, the world elite have long been financing the development of a highly restrictive and fully controlled by the New World Order “authorities” Internet 2. The project was founded in 1996 and is now ready for implementation. It’s the decision to launch it before the end of this year that Jay Rockefeller had the dubious honor and the obvious pleasure to announce.

The threat to the free internet is now real and should not be underestimated.

US Military Intel Confirmed Jewish Domination (Protocols)

Read the following declassified United States Military Intelligence Division Report on the Protocols of Zion and you will see that the US MID believed the Protocols to be authentic. Everything else is just Zionist noise.


THE POWER AND AIMS OF INTERNATIONAL JEWRY

The below given report is a U.S. War Department investigation and evaluation of issues generated by Jewish power. It was compiled in August 1919 and given SECRET classification until 1973. A hard copy of this document may be obtained from U.S. National Archives in Washington DC, - its number is 245-1.


PART 1

THE POWER AND AIMS OF INTERNATIONAL JEWRY

[page 1 of doc. begins]

The recent emphasis in American public opinion placed on the part the Jews have been taking in world events, has seemed to warrant the Department in undertaking a preliminary study of the particular matters in controversy and also the larger question of the scope of Jewish influence in world affairs today. Among the more important points around which controversy has waged are:

I. The authenticity of the so-called Jewish Protocols, which purport to set forth a Jewish plan, centuries old, of world domination.

II. The question of how far Jewry as such is connected with Bolshevism, not only in the Soviet Government of Russia and Hungary, but in all the other countries of the world and particularly Germany and the United States.

III. The various phases of the Polish question:

(a) Whether the Jewish anti-Polish propaganda in the United States has been based on actual widespread Jewish Pogroms in Poland, or

(b) Whether, on the contrary, the stories of pogroms have been greatly exaggerated as a part of a deliberate Zionist propaganda to get for the Jews in Poland minority rights which both factions of American Poles publicly denounce as amounting to the creation of a state within a state.

(c) How serious is the nation-wide secret boycott against all Jews and Jewish goods recently started by the American Poles and other Slavic sympathizers ?



[page 2 of doc. begins]

It is self evident that in controversies such as these the Jews are strongly on the defensive on one side while the Slavic peoples are bitter in their denunciation upon the other. The important thing for us, however, is the fact that Americans in the main do not sense the situation nor appreciate its dangerous possibilities.



Unfortunately there is too much truth in the charge made by the Slavs that the reasons for this is that the American press is so largely owned and controlled by the Jews. Witness the fact that the so-called Jewish Protocols which constitute by far the most serious charge against the Jews of those above enumerated, have never been mentioned in any American publication other than the official report of the Senate Judiciary Committee containing the testimony about the Protocols.



I. THE JEWISH PROTOCOLS:

The so-called Jewish Protocols purport to be the official pronouncement of the program of Jewish world domination drawn up by Theodore Herzl the founder of the modern Zionist movement and presented by him in 1897 to the inner circle of the first Zionist Congress at Basle, Switzerland. A summary of them was first published in Russia about 1905 by Serge Nilus who claims to have had a copy stolen from the Zionist files in France.



In 1915 [barely legible on doc. possibly reads 1916] Nilus wrote another book entitled "IT IS NEAR RIGHT AT THE DOOR", dealing largely with the danger of the Jew in world affairs. Here he sets out what he claims to be the full and exact translation of the Protocols. This book was published early in 1917 at a Russian Monastery near Moscow, but shortly after the first Russian Revolution of 1917 it was ordered suppressed and so even in that country it was exceedingly difficult to obtain.



[page 3 of doc. begins]

Dr. George A. Simons testifying before the Senate Committee said (Pages 135, 136 and 137 of the Record):

Senator Nelson: Are Lenine and Trotsky Yiddish ?

Mr. Simons: Lenine is from a very fine old Russian family, so we are told, and is intellectually a very able man. A fanatic, he was called the brains of this movement. Trotsky is a Jew. His real name is Leon Bronstein.

Senator King: Why are they so bitter toward religion, especially the Christian religion ?

Mr. Simons: There is a gentleman here in America who last night called on me, Dr. Harris A. Houghton, I think is his full name. I knew him out in Bay Side when I was the pastor of that church. He called on me last night. He is a Captain in the United States Army. I had not seen him for six years. He asked me whether I knew anything about the anti-Christian element in the Bolshevik regime. I said, "Indeed I do". I do know all about it."



He said, "Did you ever come across the so-called Jewish protocols ?" I said "Yes, I have had them." "I have a memorandum" he said, "and last winter after much trouble I came into possession of a book which was called "REDUSTI, ANTI-CHRIST." Now, Dr. Houghton in the meantime had investigated this. He had come into possession of this book, which is quite rare now, because it was said that when the edition came out it was immediately bought up by the Jews in Petrograd and Moscow.



That book reflects a real organization. That book is of some consequence. But the average person in official life here in Washington and elsewhere is afraid to handle it. Houghton says that even in his intelligence bureau they were afraid of it.

Senator King: Tell us about the book. What is bad about it ? Is it anti-Christian ?

Mr. Simons: It is anti-Christian and it shows what this secret Jewish society has been doing in order to make a conquest of the world, and to make the Christian forces as ineffective as possible, and finally to have the whole world, if you please, in their grip; and now in that book ever so many things are said with regard to their program and their methods, which dovetail into the Bolshevik regime. It just looks as if that connected in some way.

Now, I have no animus against the Jews, but I have a great passion for truth: If there is anything in it I think we ought to know. The man who wrote it is considered a truth-loving man, a man held in the highest esteem by the authorities of the Russian Orthodox Church. ******

Senator Nelson: In this book that you refer to is there anything that goes to show that this Bolshevik government of Russia are supporting, directly or indirectly, this book of protocols ?

[page 4 of doc. begins]

Mr. Simons: Before answering that question I should like to see that translation, because I do not know how this thing has been done. (A pamphlet was handed to the witness.)

Senator Nelson: You have seen the original book ?

Mr. Simons: Yes. Some very finely educated Russian generals of note have told me that they considered this as an authentic thing, and they say the marvelous part of it is that nearly all of that is being executed under the Bolsheviki.

It is true by his extravagant statements since giving this testimony Dr. Simons has been somewhat discredited. However, while on the stand, under oath, he spoke with unusual care, and other people who had been in Russia at the time covered by his testimony were unable to criticize his story. Those of his statements reprinted in the press brought out the first public condemnation of Bolshevism by such Jewish leaders in America as Louis Marshall.

Recently the Department was able to examine what is said to be the only copy now in the United States of this Nilus book containing the Protocols. At that time photostatic copies of the Russian text were made for the Department files.

As stated above, there has been no reference in the press to the existence or the contents of the Protocols, nor to Dr. Simons testimony concerning them, although there was wide publicity to this more general charges as to the part the Jews were taking in the Bolshevik Government and an equally wide publicity to the vigorous denial of leading American Jews to this letter charge. Nevertheless, the testimony concerning the Protocols, which was given at an open public hearing and which has recently been published in the official Senate Report, has given them a certain limited publicity.



We have been informed at second hand that an English translation of the Protocols has been shown to Justice Brandeis and Jacob Schiff each of whom vigorously disclaimed their authenticity, Mr. Schiff asserting that they are a creation of German propagandists. This explanation seems almost impossible considering the circumstances of the Russian publication - facts which



[page 5 of doc. begins]

perhaps were not made known to him, at the time he saw the translation, much less probable than the suggestion said to have been made by Justice Brandeis that the Protocols are the creation of a fanatic Russian anti-Semite.

It is not the purpose of this memorandum to make any argument toward establishing their genuineness. As previously stated, [hand written insert illegible] the Protocols are attributed to Herzl himself and one certainly must note the identity of thought found in the Protocols on the one hand and in Herzl's public writings, and in the writings of other prominent past and contemporary Jewish leaders on the other. (Note 1.)

Note 1:

Protocol 1, page 1: "According to the law of being might is right."
Protocol 1, page 3: "Our right lies in force."
Herzl, "The Jewish State", page 2: "For this, as indeed every point which arises in the commerce of nations, is a question of might. ******* In the world of today and for an indefinite period, it will probably remain so, might precious right."



A number of similar illustrations such as the quotations relating to the "Terrible power of the Jewish purse" are set out in Appendix A.



[page 6 of doc. begins]

Some of the important events which have occurred since 1897 have fulfilled in a striking manner the predictions and aims expressed in the Protocols themselves. (Note 2.)



Note 2: The coming of a world war is predicted which the Jews are to secretly promote. The creation of the chaos of Bolshevism is described as to be worked out by Jews all over the world as a step towards Jewish world dominion. For a fuller discussion of these and similar illustrations see Appendix B.

Furthermore, it is impossible to read far in the Protocols and in the public writings of Hess, Herzl and other Jewish Leaders without being impressed with the constant reiteration of certain fundamental principles and ideals. Among the more important of these around which the forces of Jewry are now rallying are the following:




PART 2

November 22, 2001

THE POWER AND AIMS OF INTERNATIONAL JEWRY

1.

The Jews are a nation held together by their common enemies. (Note 3.)
2.

With the Jews Nationality and Religion are inseparable and co-extensive.
3.

All groups of Jews from the extreme radicals (Poole Zionist) to the most conservative, are united in this National Religious Movement.
4.

Once a Jew always a Jew.
5.

The teachings of the Talmud still exercises a profound influence on Jewish life.
6.

Judaism and Socialism are different expressions of the same movement.
7.

The Jews consider themselves the original exponents of internationalism and the League of Nations. (Note 4.)

Note 3: See Herzl’s "Jewish State" page 4, and Dr. Solomon Prest, of the United Synagogues of America. (New York Times, June 17, 1919, page 3.)

Note 4: For a full discussion of these principles with citations from Moses Hess, Theodor Herzl, Bernard Lazarre, H. Sacher and the lectures now being distributed by the Zionist Organization in America, see Appendix C.



[page 7 of doc. begins]

In any event the Protocols are of suggestive value in the study of present-day International Jewry. They indicate possible or probable fields of Jewish activities, aims and methods, and as such, without relying on them at all as evidence in themselves, we have used them as a point of departure for some phases of our study.



[page 8 of doc. begins]

II. HOW FAR IS JEWRY, AS SUCH, CONNECTED WITH BOLSHEVISM, NOT ONLY IN THE SOVIET GOVERNMENT OF RUSSIA AND HUNGARY BUT IN ALL OTHER COUNTRIES OF THE WORLD AND PARTICULARLY IN GERMANY AND IN THE UNITED STATES:

(a) There is, of course, a vast amount of material in the Department relating to this problem. Here, however, a mere outline will be sufficient to indicate the general tendencies. The following quotation will illustrate the widespread participation of Jews in all revolutionary movements:

(1) Theodore Herzl’s "JEWISH STATE".

Page 8. "Educated Jews without means are fast becoming Socialists."
Page 10. "When we sink we become a revolutionary proletariat, the subordinate officers of the revolutionary party."

(2) Theodor Herzl’s "CONGRESS ADDRESSES".

Page 13. "That the Jews constitute a disintegrating element is habitually maintained."

(3) Lecture on "SOCIAL ZIONISM” published and now circulated by the Zionist organization of America.

Page 4. "From the days of the prophets down to the present time the Jew has been the inveterate enemy of tyranny and our contribution to the ranks of labor leaders and social philosophers is one of the marvels of history. In ancient times it was Isaiah, Jeremiah and the lesser Prophets who thundered agains those who added "house to house” while the common people were suffering against huger and privations. The thinkers and leaders of the Socialist Party during the last century, Karl Marx, Ferdinand Lasalle and many others were Jews, even though some of them sold their birthright for "a mess of pottage". In fact any careful historian must come to the conclusion that the Jews are a race representing the great social factor in modern history."

(4) Rabbi Judah L. Magnus, who has been very closely associated with Jacob H. Schiff, in a speech before the Jewish Labor Congress January 15, 1919 published in the JEWISH FORUM for February 1919 states:

Page 722: "When the Jew gives his thought, his devotion to the cause of the workers and of the dispossessed,


[page 9 of doc.begins]

of the disinherited of the world, the radical quality within him there, too, goes to the root of things, and in Germany he comes as Marx and a Lasalle, a Haas and an Edward Bernstein; in Austria he becomes a Victor Adler and a Friederich Adler; in Russia a Trotsky. Just take for a moment the present situation in Russia and Germany. The Revolution set creative forces free, and see what a large company of Jews was available for immediate service. Socialist Revolutionaries and Mensheviki; Bolsheviki; Majority and Minority Socialists whatever they be called ******* Jews are to be found among the trusted leaders and the routine workers of all those revolutionary parties."

(b) RUSSIA !

Many of the witnesses who testified before the Senate Committee stated quite definitely that most of the prominent Bolshevik leaders were Jews. The following are quotations from one or two:

(1) Mr. Theodor Kryshtofovitch (page 424 Senate Record):

"Most of the people governing Russia now are Jews. I am not against Jews in general. They are a very capable and energetic people, but as you Americans say, the right man must be in the right place. Their place is in the Commission Houses, in Banks, in the offices, but not in the government of a fine agricultural country. They do not understand anything about agriculture, about production, about keeping materials and about distribution ********* I am talking about Bolsheviki; because if you take our Bolshevik Government, Lenine is a Russian and all these constellations that are turning around this sun are Jews. They have changed their names. For instance, Trotsky is not Trotsky but Bronstein."



Again on page 431 he says:



"They oppose the Russian clergy and the Russian clergy oppose the Bolsheviki, and the Russian priests are treated very badly. For instance, they are set to do street work, cleaning the streets, paving streets, digging ditches, and so on. The workmen told me several times: ‘The Bolsheviki are sending out priests to work in the streets. Why do they not send their Rabbis ?’ And that is true. The Jewish Rabbis are not sent to work on the streets."

Colonel V. S. Hurban, the leader of the Checho-Slovaks in Russia (page 444 of the Senate Record):

"It is also logical that the morals of the officials should be corrupt. I cannot deny it because it is a fact, and it is useless to deny it, that in the Soviets from the beginning there have been a very large percentage of Jews. It cannnot be denied. I can explain myself. We cannot blame them because it is just their revenge."


[page 10 of doc. begins]

(c) HUNGARY

The following appears in a despatch to the Department, describing conditions in Hungary, quoted on page 37 of the confidential weekly report of the Division of Western European Affairs for June 28, 1919:

"Of the Communist Commissaries (of whom 25 out of 32 are Jews), several are assigned to each department."

As a sample of general frank public comment on the Bolshevik regime in Hungary may be cited the following from an article on "The Forces of Disintegration” appering in THE NEW EUROPE of June 19, 1919:

"The internal situation in Hungary is comparatively simple at this moment. The issue of the war involved the bankruptcy of the whole ruling oligarchy and of the Jewish parasites who had battened upon them for over a generation past. But while the former fell with a resounding crash, a large section of the latter suddenly laid violent hands upon the machine of the State, and have since the Spring been endeavoring to recover, under a mask of advanced Communist theories, fragments of what the old imperialism had lost to the Magyar State. ********** Meanwhile we need be under no illusions as to the present regime in Hungary. In Budapest such illusions have long since vanished, and all who come from there tell the same tale. The present Communist Government of Budapest is merely a glorified edition of "Sussex Street". Bela Kun - a convicted thief who is proud of his record and brags publicly of his capacity for lying - is on a par with Peter the Painter, while his colleagues (save a couple of honest doctrinaires, and an occasional figurehead selected for purposes of camouflage) are altogether worthy of him.

(d) GERMANY:

The early efforts of the Bolsheviki to get control in Russia were financed by German Government, largely through the German Jewish banking firm of M. N. Warburg and Company of Hamburg, established in 1798, one of the most powerful banks in all of Germany, and instrumental in directing the international policy of the old German Empire. Max Warburg, head of this firm, cooperated in this matter with his brother Fritz, Financial Attache of the German Legation at Stockholm and as such, head of and general paymaster



[page 11 of doc. begins]

for the German spy system. Practically all of the men who participated in the negotiations with the Bolsheviki in turning over these funds were Jews.

A number of the returning Military Attaches as for example, Lieutenant Waldo from The Hague, have emphasized that the personnel, methods and aims of the new German Foreign Office were, in a large measure, the same as those of the old regime.

Therefore, the statement in the BRITISH CONFIDENTIAL WEEKLY REVIEW for June 4, 1919 (page 2) would seem at least possible:

"Evidence is accumulating that the German Government directed the Munich Revolution through Agents provocateurs. The "ROTE FAHNE” seems to have been under Government control, and an organization called: "VEREINIGUNG ZU BEKAMPFUNG DES BOLSHEVISMUS”, and espionage association covering the whole of Germany, had exact information on every phase of the Munich rising. This association is headed by Prussian Officers and works in connection with the Government."





PART 3

November 22, 2001

THE POWER AND AIMS OF INTERNATIONAL JEWRY

... Concerning the leaders of the Munich Soviet Revolution, Ben Hecht, himself a radical, in a cable published in the CHICAGO DAILY NEWS said:

"As for the Communist leaders in Bavaria, for instance Toller, Levine, Muhsam, Landauer, Lipp, and, in fact, all whom I met in the April Soviet days in Munich, were Jews."

As to the general Jewish influence in Germany, Hecht states:

"One of the tragi-comic sides of the feverish German situation today is the position of the German Jews. Although less than one per cent of the German population consists of Jews, fully 75% of its present leaders - conservative and radical - are Semitic. The only political party which has no Jewish leaders is the centre or Catholic party, controlled by Mathias Erzberger. In Weimar, however, I have seen numerous centrist delegates to the national assembly whose Catholicism was political rather than racial.

As for the majority socialist, it must be remembered that the socialist party was founded by Karl Marx, a Jew, and co-ordinated by Ferdinand Lasalle and the elder Liebknecht, also Jews, while it was economically developed by Singer, another Jew. On the other hand the most active anti-socialist leaders in Germany - Theodor Wolff, George Bernhard and a dozen others of similar standing - are likewise Jews.

Hugo Haase, leader of the independent socialist party, is a Jew, as are practically all of its more important leaders, with the exception of Dr. Rudolph Breitscheld.

Nearly all of the newspaper editors and publicists whom I have encountered, from Maximilian Harden up and down the line, are Jews, and, so far as I can make out, nearly all the Berlin bankers are of the same race."


[page 12 of doc. begins]

(e) ENGLAND.

On April 8, 1919, the LONDON MORNING POST in an editorial commenting on the part the Jews were taking in Russian Bolshevism and the further fact that two of the leading British Jewish papers were openly pro-Bolshevik, stated:

"We have mentioned several times the disagreeable fact that the Russian Bolsheviks were Jews. These Jews are at the present moment in control of the Russian Government and they have powerful friends in all the Allied countries, who are helping them. We have appealed to the British Jews, but appealed so far in vain, to dissociate themselves from the cause which is doing the Jewish people terrible harm in all parts of the world. In reply the Jewish press shower upon us not only abuse but threats."

This article brought forth a letter published in the LONDON POST of April 23, 1919 signed by the following ten leading British Jews:

*

Major Lionel de Rothschild, M.P.
*

Lord Swaythling
*

Sir Philip Magnus, Bart, M.P.
*

Alderman Sir Marcus Samuel, Bart
*

Right Honorable Sir Harry S. Samuel, M.P.
*

Mr. Leonard L. Cohen
*

Sir Israel Gollancz
*

Lieutenant-General Sir John Monash, G.O.N.G.
*

Mr. Claude G. Montefiore
*

Sir Isidore Spielmann, C.M.G.

The letter stated in part:

"We have read with the deepest concern and with sincere regret certain articles which have recently appeared in two closely associated Jewish newspapers in this country on the topic of Bolshevism and its "ideals". In our opinion, the publication of these articles can have no other effect than to encourage the adoption of the theoretic principles of Russian Bolsheviks among foreign Jews who have sought and found refuge in England. We welcome, accordingly, your suggestion that British Jews should "dissociate themselves from a cause which is doing the Jewish people harm in all parts of the world". This is profoundly true, and we, on our own behalf and on behalf of numbers of British Jews, with whom we have conferred, desire to dissociate themselves absolutely and unreservedly from the mischievous and misleading doctrine which those articles are calculated to disseminate. We repudiate them as dangerous in themselves and as false to the tenets teachings of Judaism.

Partly in order to counteract the mistaken policy of the newspapers referred to, the League of British Jews was founded in November 1917. The proceedings and views of the League are published in a monthly bulletin, entitled JEWISH OPINION which can be obtained at the Offices of the League, 708-709, Salisbury House, E.C. 2, and which may eventually be merged



[page 13 of doc. begins]

"in a larger journal appearing at more frequent intervals. For we thoroughly concur with your criticism that the "British Jewish Community”, most of whom, as you rightly say, are by no means in sympathy with this (Nationalist) crusade, are being served very badly by their newspapers". Meanwhile we take this opportunity of repudiating in public the particular statements in those newspapers to which you have felt it your duty to call attention."


(f) UNITED STATES

Under date of February 15, 1919 Louis Marshall in denying the charges made before the Senate Committee that the New York East Side was Bolshevist and had furnished many Russian Bolshevists Commissars said: (Page 379 of the Senate Record):

"I read the Yiddish newspapers and am constantly called into consultation and conference with respect to every imaginable movement that can concern the public which affects the East Side, and I can, therefore, speak with authority when I say that there never has been a baser slander uttered than to charge by innuendo that the Jews of the East Side are Bolshevists."

In a report dated May 20, 1919, M. C. Keyes, Treasury Secret Service Agent stated:

When Dr. Simons, formerly a resident of Russia made the statement that "90% of the Bolsheviks in New York were Jews”, the entire radical element in New York rose in arms and through the influence that they could exert they villified a man whose only crime was being too modest in his calculations. I am satisfied that instead of 90% it should be nearer the actual amount to say that 95% of the Bolsheviks are Jews. Only recently I had the opportunity to look over the records of one Soviet branch in New York. Out of a membership of 700, 625 were Jews. ****** ”

On June 17, 1919 a conversation was overheard between Nuorteva and Charles Recht, both Bolshevist Jews, in New York, in which it was stated that the entire 500,000 Jews of the East Side were Bolshevists.

Vice Consul R. B. Dennis testyfying before the Senate Committee said: (Page 178 of the Senate Record)

"Mr. Dennis: I do not know whether this belongs in this hearing or not, but a thing that interested me very much was to discover a number of men in positions of power, commissars in the cities here and there in Russia, who had lived in America.

Senator Nelson: Who had been graduated here ?

Mr. Dennis: Yes.

[page 14 of doc. begins]

Senator Nelson: Where had they lived mostly, in New York ?

Mr. Dennis: In the industrial centers. I met a number of them and I sat around and listened to attacks upon America that I would not take from any man in this country; but I took it over there because I was asking favors, and I was not in a position to get into an altercation, as I did not want to get in jail.

Senator Nelson: Were the men who had lived for years in this country, and had gone back there, occupying prominent positions in the Bolshevik Government ?

Mr. Dennis: Yes Sir.

Senator Wolcott: In the main, of what nationality were they ?

Mr. Dennis: Hebrew.

Senator Wolcott: German Hebrews ?

Mr. Dennis: Russian Hebrews. The men that I met there had lived in America according to their stories, anywhere from 5 to 12 years.


[page 15 of doc. begins]

III. THE POLISH QUESTION

(a) Has the Jewish anti-Polish propaganda in the United States been based on actual widespread Jewish pogroms ?

Louis Marshall, Judge Mack, Jacob Schiff, Israel Cohen, the British Zionist investigator, and other Jewish leaders all answer "yes".

Hugh Gibson, United States Minister to Poland on the other hand says the stories have been greatly exaggerated. For this statement he has been bitterly villified by Mr. Marshall and the American-Jewish News. Mr. Gibson also reported that many of the exaggerated pogroms stories were traceable to German propaganda sent out by way of Copenhagen. In this he is corroborated by the report of Colonel Mason of the Military Intelligence, General Staff, who spent a month in Poland during March and April.

The following quotation from Professor Askenazy, a Polish-Jewish educator and historian of Warsaw, appearing in the NEW YORK WORLD of July 2, 1919 and reprinted in FREE POLAND for July 16, 1919, would seem to present an accurate summary:

"The outside world is getting an entirely exaggerated idea, and I see my co-religionists in New York are acting on what was evidently unverified information coming from many sources. They have denounced Poland for things which never happened. With Poland young and struggling and beset with enemies it has enough trouble without having attacks from our people, who have always received better treatment from the Poles than from any other people in Eastern Europe. ****



PART 4

November 22, 2001

THE POWER AND AIMS OF INTERNATIONAL JEWRY


It is true that there have been local outbreaks against the Jews, for special reasons, due to upset conditions, and tales about Jewish profiteering, particularly from Russian Bolshevik Jews, who are trying to upset the Polish nationalist spirit. **** I remark with wonder that the leaders of America’s greatest Jewish societies are lending themselves to this movement, for all this agitation in America is only helping Germany and Bolshevik Russia. *** Whenever one Jew has been hurt in Poland, Jews say ten were killed and Germans say a thousand. If a Jew is killed in conflict, like the Jews in Vilna who fought with the Bolsheviki, the German press immediately spreads a tale of a Polish pogrom in Vilna."



[page 16 of doc. begins]

(b) Have the Jewish Zionists as a part of a definite propaganda to get for the Jews of Poland minority rights, deliberately exaggerated the stories of pogroms in Poland ?

The BILL OF RIGHTS adopted at the American-Jewish Congress at Philadelphia on December 19, 1918, requested the Peace Conference to grant to the Jews in new or enlarged states to be created by the Conference, autonomous management of all Jewish communal institutions and insisted that such autonomy be a condition precedent to the creation of any such state. Poland being the largest and most important new state thus to be formed, it was natural that the Jews should center their efforts on establishing this principle there.

To quote from one of their own number, (Israel Cohen, in the WASHINGTON POST, May 30, 1919):

"MINORITY RIGHTS"

There is only one way in which the civil equality of the Jews can be preserved and that is by their being given the rights of a national minority. The Jews should be given autonomy as far as the administration of their religious, cultural, social and charitable affairs are concerned, but they should also be constituted a separate electoral college with the right to proportional representation in the Polish Parliament. And in order to establish a good working understanding between them and the government, it is advisable that there should be a ministry of Jewish affairs, the head of which should be responsible to a representative council of the organized Jewish communities."

The Polish protest against the published demands of the Jews was followed by a publicity campaign to create a sentiment hostile to Poland, principally in the United States, for use at the Peace Conference in support of the Jewish claims.

In the United States the propaganda adopted by the Jews took two forms: (1) Newspaper attacks, and (2) organized protest meetings, parades and similar demonstrations.

(1) A careful reading of the prominent articles concerning alleged atrocities against the Jews in Poland which began appearing simultaneously in the leading American papers about the middle of May, shows a striking similarity in form, in substance and in

[page 17 of doc. begins]

headlines, a similarity so striking as to have no other reasonable explanation than that of a thoroughly planned propaganda. Information has come to us at second-hand that Reuben Fink, Washington representative of the Zionists, supervised the dissemination of this newspaper material. Confidential despatches from Copenhagen describe a German inspired organization abroad to supply news of pogroms for publication in the American-Jewish press.

Many of the first stories published in May were based on a report of Israel Cohen published in the LONDON TIMES of February 14, 1919. For example, on May 28, 1919 the NEW YORK HERALD and the WASHINGTON POST ran front page accounts by Herman Bernstein of Cohen’s report, but the phrasing was such as to lead the readers to believe that they described Pogroms which were still going on, whereas, Cohen was actually reporting as to events in November, December and January when, as is well known, during the chaos attendant on the triangular struggle with the Germans’ retreating and attempting to turn the country over to the Bolsheviki, and the Poles asserting their National Independence against both groups, there were, of course, many Jews, Poles, Germans and Bolshevists killed. Moreover, Cohen only recited the killing of 161 people during the entire three months covered by his report.

Contrast with this the statement of Rabbi Tittlebaum (State Department I. B. 861.4016/245 [decipherment may not be accurate]) concerning the persecution of the Jews in Southern Russia, in which he tells of the killing and wounding of hundreds of thousands, 5000 being killed in the town of Proscorof alone. There has been little publicity about this in the United States, probably because it would defeat the purpose of the Zionist propaganda as showing that the outbreaks against the Jews in Poland were more restrained and accompanied by much less loss of life that those in other places where chaotic conditions prevailed, such as Southern Russia.

[page 18 of doc. begins]

A further illustration of the way false stories of atrocities were used is shown by the articles about Vilna. The Department received word in May that the Zionist Bureau at Berlin reported 200 Jews killed at Vilna. On June 8, 1919 the WASHINGTON POST, NEW YORK TIMES and others carried a story from Paris under a large headline saying: "1600 Jews killed at Vilna." From Gibson’s reports (telegram June 17, 1919), it appears that 64 Jews were shot and at least ten of them were admitted by the Jewish representatives to have been killed in the house-to-house fighting by which the Poles took the city from the Bolsheviki.

(2) In all the principal cities of the United States mass meetings were held, preceded by parades for which the Jewish workmen obtained a half holiday. The principal meeting was held at Madison Square Garden, New York on May 21, 1919 following a series of parades and other thoroughly organized demonstrations in which a large number of the Jews of the East Side participated. The most important addresses were made by Charles E. Hughes and Jacob Schiff. Mr. Hughes in defending himself against the charge by the Poles that he was playing politics, and had no facts upon which to base his protest, stated that "a careful investigation should speedily be had, but in the meantime the report which have come in - vouched for by such men as Judge Mack and Louis Marshall, men of recognized standing, ability and probity, - justify in my opinion, the most earnest protest."

In determining whether Mr. Hughes was warranted in accepting this ex parte statement, it should be noted that both Judge Mack and Mr. Marshall, as well as Jacob Schiff, are all members of the Executive Committee of the Jewish Kehillah in New York, which Committee has as its Chairman Rabbi Judah L. Magnus who, at one time, was very pro-German and is now an open and avowed advocate of Bolshevism both in Russia and in the United States. As to the Kehillah itself, while it is ostensibly interested solely in Jewish Community work, some question has been raised to its alleged pro-German and subsequent pro-

[page 19 of doc. begins]

Bolshevik tendencies. Furthermore, Mr. Marshall’s partner, Samuel Untermeyer, received considerable notoriety at the Senate hearing on German propaganda because of his pro-German activity. Mr. Untermeyer has now appeared as chief counsel for the Rand School and the American Socialist Society in defending their charter.

In the NEW YORK TIMES of May 24, 1919, Felix M. Warburg is quoted as saying:

"It is to be regretted that the protest meetings of the Jews against the Pogroms which have taken place, in the desire to prevent further ones, appear in the papers as an attempt by the Jews to prejudice Americans against the new Polish Government."

"Naturally the Jews are deeply interested in the welfare of their co-religionists, of whom about 5,000,000 are not living in the new Poland. What these protests mean is simply an earnest pleading that every possible step, official and unofficial, be taken by the new Polish Government to prevent outbreaks by an excited populace which, feeling its new strength and old prejudices may, if not held in check, break loose when not watched. That is all we hope for."

As a commentary on this interview the following extracts from an article entitled "PEACE WITHOUT HONOR” by G. K. Chesterton, appearing in THE NEW WITNESS, an English anti-Semitic paper, of April 18, 1919, page 494, seems in point:

"What concerns us in the crisis of Europe is the facts, and when we know we are dealing with the facts of hatred, we connot be confused or even delayed by the fiction of hypocrisy. ***** and the fact is not that the Jews wish well to the new State, but that the Jews are at this moment using all their keen intellectual activity and their deep racial loyalty, working all over the world at high pressure, to prevent the new Polish State coming into existance at all."

******** We know that if they lose their port (Danzig) it will not be by any act of English public opinion or any public opinion, but by the most secret of all secret diplomacy; that it will not even be given up by the English to the Germans, but by the Germans Jews to other German Jews."

As a further comment in the attitude of the Polish Jews themselves toward the new Polish State may be quoted the following from Colonel Mason’s report:

"Poland has recently put into effect a universal draft law, and the army is being mobilized under it. The men

[page 20 of doc. begins]

are collected at training stations and are receiving training under the general supervision of a French General, the actual instructors being Poles who have had military training or experience in either the German, Austrian or Russian armies. The army is very largely composed of Poles. Upon the passage of the draft law, 90% of the Jews of the country called for what is known as the blue ticket, which is an exemption certificate given to those who are aliens. Incidentally this has an important political bearing as being an official announcement by 90% of the Polish Jews that they consider themselves not Poles but Jews per se."

As a result of the publicity given these Jewish and German inspired anti-Polish protests, both in this country and abroad, the Poles were defeated and "The Combined Jewish Committees of the World” headed by Mr. Louis Marshall were able to secure (1) the special provisions set out in Articles 8 to 12, inclusive, of the Polish Treaty and, (2) the general acquiescence in these provisions on the part of the American Press. The American Poles, however, are more bitter than ever in their denouncement of these articles as undemocratic and un-American. Because of this attitude on their part it seems in point to analyze the articles in question.

Article 8 - provides that racial, religious and linguistic minorities shall have the right to establish, manage and control, at their own expense, charitable, religious and social institution and schools, with the right to use their own language and to exercise their own religion freely therein.

Article 9 - provides (Paragraph 1) that in public schools where there is a considerable proportion of Polish nationals of other than Polish speech the children shall be taught in their own language.

Article 9 - (Paragraph 2) Racial, religious and linguistic minorities shall be assured an equitable share in the enjoyment and application of the sums which may be provided out of public funds ***** for educational, religious or charitable purposes. (This paragraph would appear to supersede in a large measure Article 8 above.)





PART 5

November 22, 2001

THE POWER AND AIMS OF INTERNATIONAL JEWRY

Article 10 - Educational Committee appointed locally by Jewish communities will provide for distribution of proportional share of public funds allocated to Jewish schools in accordance with Article 9 and for organization and management of these schools. The provisions of Article 9 concerning the use of language in schools shall apply to these schools.

[page 21 of doc. begins]

Article 11 - provides that Jews shall not be compelled to violate their Sabbath and that no elections or registration shall be held on a Saturday.

Article 12 - provides that the foregoing provisions constitute obligations of international concern and shall he placed under the guarantee of the League of Nations, no change to be made without the consent of majority of council of League of Nations which will be binding on the United States and the leading Allies. Any member of the League Council can call attention of the Council to possible infraction, and Coucil may take jurisdiction of question.

Mr. Marshall in an interview of July 24, 1919 said:

"The rights which have been secured have not been affected in favor of the Jews alone, but for all minorities."

In this connection it is worthy of notice that Article 10 and 11 relate solely to the Jews.

In an earlier interview of June 30, 1919 (NEW YORK TIMES, July 1) Mr. Marshall said:

"Nothing thus far accomplished by the Peace Conference exceeds in importance the Polish Treaty. **** It is literally a charter of Liberty and the final act of emancipation of those who, for centuries, have been bereft of elemental human rights. ******* It enshrines in the law of nations the eternal principles of human liberty that constitute the distinctive features of the American Constitution by means of which, despite the divergent racial elements of our population, we have become in fact as well as in spirit, a homogeneous, patriotic, just nation. We have long appreciated what at last is to enter into the consciousness of all people - that the true purpose of government cannot be realized until majorities look upon minorities as their equal before the law."

This statement is misleading because it gives the reader the idea that the rights granted the Jews in Poland are only those enjoyed by Jewish Americans whereas, quite the contrary is true. Another interesting point is that this interview bears the same date as the text of the Polish Treaty, namely, June 30, 1919, but the interview appeared July 1, 1919 in the NEW YORK TIMES, while the Treaty was withheld until the day following.

Premier Clemenceau as quoted in the NEW YORK TIMES of July 2d defended the provisions above set out saying:

"The following articles are of a rather different nature, in that they provide special privileges to certain groups of

[page 22 of doc. begins]

these minorities: ****

"Six - Clauses 10 and 12 deal specifically with the Jewish citizens of Poland. The information at the disposal of the principal Allied and Associated Powers as to the existing relations between the Jews and the other Polish citizens has led them to the conclusion that in view of the historical development of the Jewish question and the great animosity aroused by it, special protection is necessary for the Jews of Poland. These clauses have been limited to the minimum which seems necessary under the circumstances of the present day, viz., the maintenance of Jewish schools and the protection of the Jews in the religious observance of their Sabbath.

It is believed that these stipulations will not create any obstacle to the political unity of Poland. They do not constitute any recognition of the Jews as a separate political community within the Polish State. The educational provisions contain nothing beyond what is in fact provided in the educational institutions of many highly organized modern states. There is nothing inconsistent with the sovereignty of the State in recognizing and supporting schools in which children shall be brought up in the religious influence to which they are accustomed in their home. Ample safeguards against any use of non-Polish language to encourage a spirit of national separation have been provided in the express acknowledgment that the provisions of this Treaty do not prevent the Polish State from making the Polish language obligatory in all its schools and educational institutions."

In an editorial in the NEW YORK TIMES of July 25, 1919 it is frankly admitted that the rights granted to the Jews in Poland would not be tolerated for a moment in this country and offers the weak excuse for differentiation that our immigrants came here voluntarily while the racial minorities in Eastern Europe have been there for thousands of years. This utterly misses the real point of the criticism, going to the ultimate justice of the rights granted.

Says the TIMES:

"Those in this country who have feared that our participation in this arrangement will make it easy for European nations to demand similar liberties for naturalized citizens in this country and thus make impossible any attempt at real Americanization are somewhat unduly alarmed. Most of the rights included in the term "cultural autonomy" are already possessed by everybody in America. Some of them are not: the provision for separate schools in which the mother tongue of the pupils is the language of instruction, though the language of the State must also be taught, and taught satisfactorily, would only perpetuate a condition which German immigrants have brought about in some parts of this country; but the further provision that such schools should receive part of the State funds would, of course, be inadmissible here - though we have heard in the last year or two of American public schools in which German is about the only language known to teachers and pupils. Such guarantees would also perpetuate the foreign language press.

[page 23 of doc. begins]

"But no racial group in America has any reason or right to claim privileges such as are provided in the Polish Treaty, since they are all recent immigrants who of their own choice came to a country which had its own institutions and used the English language. The racial minorities of Eastern Europe have dwelt alongside other people, intermingled beyond any hope of complete separation, for hundreds and sometimes thousands of years."

In further relation to Mr. Marshall the following additional facts are of interest:

(1) On June 7th the Department issued a statement giving a summary of Mr. Gibson�s reports to the effects that the stories as to pogroms were greatly exaggerated.

(2) On June 10th Mr. Marshall gave out in Paris a report from his personal representative in Poland in which it was stated:

"In its horror and system the acts recalled the worst epochs of the Middle Ages."

(3) This was followed on June 17th by a statement from Mr. Marshall making a bitter and vituperative attack on Mr. Gibson, charging that "Gibson�s report is necessarily based on the merest hearsay, parrot-like repetition of what has been told him in court circles." Many specific charges of cruelty were also set out including several which have since been reported by Mr. Gibson as unfounded.

This statement was played up in "THE JEWISH DAILY NEWS� (New York) of June 18th under the headlines "Mr. Gibson Indicted". The article stated:

"Mr. Louis Marshall, chairman of the Jewish Delegation in Paris, has not permitted the grass to grow beneath his feet. No sooner did Mr. Hugh Gibson, whose nomination as Ambassador to Poland is now before the Senate, report to the State Department that there were no pogroms in Poland that Mr. Marshall set to work to show that Mr. Gibson "has reported contrary to facts".



Through Mr. Charles A. Selden, the Paris correspondent of the "NEW YORK TIMES", Mr. Marshall issued a statement giving chapter and verse of the atrocities committed against the Jews in Poland by the Poles themselves. From the statement which appears on this page, it will be seen that the Poles admitted the pogroms, yet Mr. Gibson never heard of pogroms or knows anything of them. In other words his report is an attempt to whitewash the Poles." *****

In view of Mr. Marshall's statement, and the attitude adopted by Mr. Gibson, we do not think the latter is the proper person to represent this country in Poland. His nomination is, as we have already said, now pending before the United States Senate. We have felt it our duty to protest against Mr. Gibson's confirmation by the Senate and have sent the following telegram to Senator Calder, Wadsworth and Penrose:



[page 24 of doc. begins]

'Louis Marshall's indictment of Hugh Gibson, him deliberately reporting conditions in Poland contrary to facts, as printed in today's 'NEW YORK TIMES', makes Mr. Gibson unfit to be American Ambassador to Poland. We appeal to you to block confirmation of his nomination.'

"We want to go on record that a man who in toto denies the wantom slaughter of human beings, of old men and women, of young girls and little children, is not the man to whom should be entrusted so important a post as the American Ambassadorship to Poland.

If the stories of the pogroms had been found to be untrue we would have accepted Mr. Gibson�s report, but when he bases his finding upon mere hearsay, we must dissent."

In relation to the deliberate campaign to defeat Mr. Gibson's confirmation, shown in the above quotation, added significance attaches to the confidential report to the Department from Secretary Lansing contained in telegram No. 2910 of June 26, 5 p.m. that,

"Judge Brandeis and Felix Frankfurter in conversation with Gibson yesterday, intimated that confirmation of his appointment by the Senate might be jeopardized by the nature of his reports which they stated had done great harm to the Jewish race."

On June 19, 1919 the American Mission stated in a telegram to the Department that Marshall and Cyrus Adler advised Ambassador Morganthau to decline to serve on the President's commission to investigate pogroms against Jews and Jewish persecutions "urging that no Jew be appointed".



The telegram continued:

"Mr. Morganthau is in doubt and requests that you promptly ascertain the opinion of Schiff, Elkus, Nathan Strauss, Wise, Rosenwald and Samuel Lachman as to his acceptance."

On June 23, 1919 the Department sent duplicate telegrams to Louis Marshall at Paris and Felix Frankfurter in London conveying the following message from Judge Mack:

"All parties consulted advised Morganthau to decline appointment. Schiff, Elkus, Mack, Rosenwald, Wise, Nathan Strauss in wire to President are suggesting postponement until his return of commission and legal and technical advisors, but if inadvisable suggesting he consult Marshall and Frankfurter before acting. We have been allowed to see all of Gibson's despatches. Statement commented on by Marshall erroneously attributed to Gibson, who is shortly due in Paris. Have requested that Gibson's report be shown to Marshall. After seeing them and Gibson, advise strongly additional statement by Marshall. Mack."



[page 25 of doc. begins]

It seems quite possible that these Jewish leaders realized that an honest report would destroy the ammunition for their anti-Polish propaganda and show up more strikingly the utter unfairness of the attack on Mr. Gibson�s confirmation.






PART 6

November 22, 2001

of THE POWER AND AIMS OF INTERNATIONAL JEWRY




... (7) On July 24 Mr. Marshall stated that:

"The horror of the Pogroms in Poland and Ukrainia will ‘stagger the world’ when the truth becomes known. Tens of thousands of Jews have been killed. The pogroms were not so much the result of an organized movement as they were the outgrowth of unsettled anarchistic tendencies in the countries where they occurred. They found expression in attacks of Jews."

Heretofore he has never mentioned the Ukraine in his interviews, except very casually.

On August 1, 1919 Mr. Marshall made public the following telegram dated July 30, 1919 from Leo Motkin, Secretary of the "Combined Jewish Committee of the World” at Paris:

"Zuckerman arrived and confirms former communications. He reports new and terrible Pogroms which occurred during June at Kaminets, Podolsk, Kitaigorod, Ourinine, et cetera. The latest news is certified by three Rabbis and by other Jewish representatives at Khotine. I know these men who are from the Ukraine. They state that altogether 120,000 have been killed. In Proskurof alone 3,964 inhabitants and numerous passing people have been killed and 2,000 wounded. Among the killed were 1500 school children. Ukrainian Judaism fears total extermination. It is impossible to check the exact figures. In all of the pogroms undoubtedly dozens of thousands have been massacred."

The Department has in its files a despatch (heretofore referred to on Page 17) dated April 2, 1919 from the American Commissioner at Constantinople quoting Rabbi Tittlebaum in which he stated hundreds of thousand of Jews had been killed and wounded in the Ukraine and that 5000 were killed in Proscorog alone. This information undoubtedly came to Mr. Marshall in April. Why then, has the story remained unpublished all these months ? It is asserted by the Poles to be because such a publication would have weakened, if not utterly destroyed the case which they claim the Jews were so laborously building up in support of their minority rights in Poland.



[page 26 of doc. begins]

On August 2, 1919 the day following the publication of the above telegram, the Ukrainian National Committee in New York issued a statement in part as follows:

"There are not and have not been pogroms in Ukraine outside the zone of Bolshevism. While unfortunately it probably is true that there have been many innocent victims of lawless bands in Ukraine, just as there have been Jewish victims of the Polish soldiery in Galicia, the killings are the work of the Bolsheviki and the Bolsheviki alone." ******



"The Ukrainian People’s Republic has granted autonomy to all national minorities, including the Jews. Special privileges have been granted the Jews and members of the race are not only members of the General Rada but are included in the ministry. The Ukrainian paper money even bears inscriptions in Jewish characters. It is significant fact that the Ukrainian Jews have never raised a single protest against Petlura’s government, but have always supported it heartily."

"Petlura, of course, has not been able to prevent pogroms in the portion of Russian Ukraine controlled by the Bolsheviki or the part of Galician Ukraine overrun by the Polish imperialists. He is making progress in both sections, however, and when he has restored the entire Ukrainian territory to the Ukrainians there will be no massacres in Ukraine."

Whether the cooperation between the Jews and the Ukrainians here shown is born simply of their mutual hatred of the Poles, or whether in addition the Ukrainians are receiving financial support from the Jews, it is in any case particularly interesting just now when the Department is being flooded with anti-Polish protests from the Ukrainians and Lithuanians in this country and in Canada.

At least one group of the Ukrainians, were openly pro-German and pro-Austrian during the war and there is evidence that in this connection it should be recalled that the Ukrainian separatist movement was started by Austria.

As to the Lithuanians and their relations with the Jews here in America may be cited the full page ad which appeared in the NEW YORK TIMES, NEW YORK WORLD, CHICAGO TRIBUNE, BOSTON POST and WASHINGTON POST on June 3 and 4, 1919, protesting against "Polish



[page 27 of doc. begins]

Imperialism and Jewish Massacres". In this ad appears a letter from the Lithuanian National Council to the Secretary of the American Committee for the Defence of the Jews in Poland, which contains the following:

"Your cause is our cause as well. The cause of all oppressed people the world over strikes a responsive chord in our hearts, but you have in common with us the additional fact that your oppressors are also our oppressors."

"Using Bolshevism as a pretext, Poland has invaded, and is now occupying, large parts of Lithuania. Its troops are there indulging in atrocities so horrible that the entire liberal opinion of the world stands aghast and raises the query once more whether Poland can really be trusted with the powers of self-government."


[page 28 of doc. begins]

(c) How serious is the nation-wide boycott against all Jews and Jewish goods recently started by the Americans of Polish descent and their Slavic sympathizers ?

The Foreign Language Bureau of the Government Loan Organization of the United States Treasury in a report of June 4, 1919 states:

"The demonstrations of May 21st, participated in by the Jewish people all through the United States in the form of a public protest against the persecution of the Jews in Poland, has produced on the part of the Polish population in the U. S. A. (nearly 4,000,000) a well managed, quietly conducted commercial and financial boycott of all Jewish merchants and vendors.

Both sides of the controversy have had ample public hearing in the Press of the U. S. A. The Poles privately maintain that the Jews are disappointed in the development of Poland into a free and independent Nation as the ambition of Jewish leaders for many generations has been to make of Poland a Jewish economic state commanding the commercial and financial channels of Eastern Europe, under a German protectorate.

Be that as it may, the Polish resentment of the Jewish propaganda against them is deep and bitter and their spirit of retaliation in this country proceeds against the Jewish pocketbook. The boycott is now well advanced all through this country and is active in every channel of trade, extending even to places of amusement.

From another source comes the information that other racial groups, namely, Russians, Ukrainians, Roumanians, Lithuanians, Czecho-Slovaks, Jugo-Slavs, Findlanders, Letts, all of Slavic origin will join in this Jewish boycott. Operations for management of same are now under way."

The Department has received a number of telegrams from the American-Polish organizations calling attention to the danger of racial conflicts here and "condemning the insincere tactics of the Jewish imperialists". (See particularly telegram from mass meeting of 15,000 in Boston June 8, 1919 representing 200,000 Polish-Americans in Massachusetts, and telegram of June 15, 1919 from mass meeting at Newark, N.J.) This last telegram also charges that Jewish employers in America have discharged Polish workers and Jewish landlords have evicted Polish tenants.

If such oppression is practiced on any large scale by the American Jews it will inevitably strengthen the boycott movement among the American Slavs and continue to fan the flame of mutual hatred between the two nationalities.
- - - - - - - - -

At this point, the document break off.



There have been published citations of this document which indicate that it is of greater length and scope than the above reproduced materials. A search is being conducted for the lost portions. If and when these materials are located, they will be posted